[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] 3nd paragraph, 4.1.3 Common Paragraph Elements Attributes
Patrick, Patrick Durusau wrote: > Greetings, > > The second and third sentences of the third paragraph of 4.1.3 read: > > If both, text:style-name and text:class-names are present, the style > referenced by the text:style-name attribute is treated like being the > first style in the list. If a conditional style is specified together > with style:class-names attribute, but without the text:style-name > attribute, then first style in style list should meet the requirements > that would apply to the text:style-name attribute if it exists. > > Question: Does the second sentence mean that the style referenced by the > text:style-name attribute becomes part of the list contained in > text:class-names? Or is it meant to say that if both exist, use the > text:style-name? > > If the former, suggest: > > If both text:style-name and text:class-names attributes are present, the > style referenced by the text:style-name attribute is treated as the > first style in the list in text:class-names. The former is meant, so I've changed the sentences and the other ouccurences of "like being" as suggested by you. > > BTW, just in case I don't get that far, 'like being' also occurs in > 5.1.3 Attributed Text, 3rd paragraph, and 9.2.15 Common Drawing Shape > Attributes, under the heading Style, 3rd paragraph. > > Comment: > > The third sentence seems confusing. > > Suggest: > > If a conditional style is specified together with style:class-names > attribute, but without the text:style-name attribute, then first style > in style list is used as the value of the missing text:style-name attribute. I've changed that as well. > > Hope everyone is having a great day! > > Patrick Michael
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]