[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: UK Comment 7
Patrick, all, I have replaced all occurencies of "unicode" and "UNICODE" with a bibliographic reference to [UNICODE], that is defined as follows (see page 697): [UNICODE] The Unicode Consortium. The Unicode Standard, Version 4.0.0, defined by: The Unicode Standard, Version 4.0 (Boston, MA, Addison-Wesley, 2003. ISBN 0-321-18578-1) Please note that this is a reference to the latest major version of UNICODE (4.0). The XML 1.0 specification itself references UNICODE 3.2. Please let me know if you consider this to be an issue. Changes were made to the following pages: 35 84 85 (2x) 86 (2x) 519 549 557 558 (2x) 560 562 577 578 I have further added references to RFC2045 on some occurencies of BASE64, and at the same time corrected the spelling of "base64" where it appeared in lower case letters. In detail: 299: The <draw:image> then element contains an <office:binary-data> element that contains the image data in BASE64 encoding. to The <draw:image> then element contains an <office:binary-data> element that contains the image data in BASE64 encoding (as defined in [RFC2045]). 690: The manifest:checksum attribute specifies the base64 encoded digest that to The manifest:checksum attribute specifies the digest in BASE64 encoding (as defined in [RFC2045]) that 691: is encoded in base64 when to is encoded in BASE64 (as defined in [RFC2045]) when 692: is encoded in base64 before to is encoded in BASE64 (as defined in [RFC2045]) before Please not that there are some more occurencies of BASE64, but they all describe the content of the <office:binary-data> element, so I think it is sufficient to have the reference to RFC2045 on page 299, where this element actually is defined. RFC2045 is defined in the bibliography index on page 697 as follows: [RFC2045] N. Freed and N. Borenstein, Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part One: Format of Internet Message Bodies, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2045.txt, IETF, 1996. If you disagree to one or more of these changes, please let me know that. Best regards Michael
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]