[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] white-space processing proposal
Lars Oppermann wrote: > Henceforth, this would imply, that for an OpenDocument application the > fragments > <text:p> this is the first fragment</text:p> > <text:p>this is the first fragment</text:p> > are equal and an ODF application should interpret them as such. I may have misunderstood last Monday's discussions, but here are some points I came away with: 1. What is MOST IMPORTANT is that everyone agree on SOME behavior, for interoperability's sake. 2. For version 1.1, the goal was to clarify the behavior so that all understand it. 3. A future version (say 1.2) could CHANGE the behavior, but it was preferred to NOT change it for 1.1. The "version" attribute makes it possible to do this in both a forwards and backwards compatible way. I may have misunderstood things; if I have, please say so. For myself, I don't really care what the resolution is, as long as there is a clear resolution. --- David A. Wheeler
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]