[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] list-override proposal
Can you then please define the meaning of continue-numbering? Seems to me that you have a rather complex view in mind. ~Florian >>> Oliver-Rainer Wittmann - Software Engineer - Sun Microsystems <Oliver-Rainer.Wittmann@Sun.COM> 03/13/07 9:15 AM >>> Hi, my view on attribute text:continue-numbering is the following: - The attribute makes a statement about how one list can continue the numbering of the preceding list. - Because by default the numbering of a list *isn't* continued - see first paragraph of sub chapter "Continue Numbering" of chapter "4.3.1 List Block", Thus, in my view the value of text:continue-numbering can't be "true", if it is missing. Because this would contradict the current ODF 1.1 specification. - The attribute is mainly introduced for lists, which are defined by <text:list>. - Because for numbered paragraphs (text:numbered-paragraphs) the current ODF 1.1 specification doesn't state, what makes a list. Thus, I've got problems to apply with attribute to numbered paragraphs - it's not clear in ODF 1.1 what makes a list a list, when numbered paragraphs are used to define the list items. Regards, Oliver. Florian Reuter wrote: > Hi David, > > I did include the "continue-numbering" on every par 'cause I couldn't find a consensus with Oliver what the default > value is. > Thomas had this concern of always repeating "continue-numbering" too. > > I updated my samples and set the default of continue-numbering to "true" (to which Oliver disagrees :-)) > > Attached is the updated sample doc. > > ~Florian > > >>>> David Faure <faure@kde.org> 03/12/07 4:37 PM >>> > On Tuesday 06 March 2007, Florian Reuter wrote: >> I also included some "normative examples" for ODF1.1 lists to avoild from misunderstandings of how lists currently > work. >> ~Florian >> numlistpar.odt > > Why do those examples specify text:continue-numbering for every numbered-paragraph? > It seems to me that samples 1 and 2 don't need it at all. > > And in sample 1 isn't it a typo that its value is false/false/true? > I don't understand why such a simple example needs continue-numbering to be set at all, > and even less why it would have a different value for those paragraphs. >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]