[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] Exchanging RelaxNG XML of the ODF spec to the compactsyntax
Hi Patrick, well, I think what we can do in addition to your suggestion is to provide a compact schema with new drafts that we upload. This would allow us to get some experience with them before we actually replace anything in the schema itself, which would be a step that actually is difficult to revert is something goes wrong. Michael Patrick Durusau wrote: > Bruce, > > Actually I asked Svante about this and he suggested: > > Relax -> compact Relax, followed by: > > compact Relax -> Relax^1, followed by: > > diff on Relax and Relax^1. > > I would add some spot checking on some of the more complex > constructions, say about 5% of the total. Just as a sanity check. > > Hope you are having a great day! > > Patrick > > Bruce D'Arcus wrote: >> Dave Pawson wrote: >>> On 15/08/07, robert_weir@us.ibm.com <robert_weir@us.ibm.com> wrote: >>>> Question is do we beleive that the Trang conversion is perfect and >>>> will not >>>> introduce any errors? >>> The author of Trang believes this is not true. >> >> An awkward sentence construction: what's the referent "this"? >> >> From the rest of your message, it sound like it is "that conversion is >> not perfect" (e.g. a double-negative), which would mean we can be safe >> assuming it is "perfect"? >> >> Bruce >> >> > -- Michael Brauer, Technical Architect Software Engineering StarOffice/OpenOffice.org Sun Microsystems GmbH Nagelsweg 55 D-20097 Hamburg, Germany michael.brauer@sun.com http://sun.com/staroffice +49 40 23646 500 http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Sitz der Gesellschaft: Sun Microsystems GmbH, Sonnenallee 1, D-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten Amtsgericht Muenchen: HRB 161028 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Wolfgang Engels, Dr. Roland Boemer Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Martin Haering
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]