[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] Groups - ODF Register of Public Comments(07-11-24-spec00025) uploaded
robert_weir@us.ibm.com wrote: > > I like option b). Okay. Then let's take that option. > > But even if something is resolved, say in ODF 1.2, we still may need to > add that issue to an errata document for an earlier version. > > I think the important thing is, for each defect reported, to ascertain > which versions of the ODF standard it applies. I agree, and for that reason have also added the information in which version the resolved items have been resolved to the public comment agenda mail I have send out yesterday. Tracking this in the agenda is of cause not the right place. This information must be moved into the spreadsheet additionally. > > Maybe we can add columns to the spreadsheet, like; ODF 1.0, ODF 1.0 > (second edition), ODF 1.1, and ODF 1.2 Draft, and indicate Yes/No (or > 1/0) whether the problem occurs in that version. Sounds like a good idea. Can you add the columns? And do you want to maintain the spreadsheet yourself or shall we agree that the one of us who chairs a certain meeting adds the information to the sheet that has been discussed/agreed in the meeting? Michael > > -Rob > ___________________________ > > Rob Weir > Software Architect > Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software > IBM Software Group > > email: robert_weir@us.ibm.com > phone: 1-978-399-7122 > blog: http://www.robweir.com/blog/ > > Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM wrote on 04/17/2008 04:59:41 AM: > > > Hi, > > > > Patrick Durusau wrote: > > > Rob, > > > > > > +1! > > > > > > One suggestion: Can you or Michael include the 10 that are to be > > > discussed in the agenda? Thinking for some of them it would be helpful > > > to take a few minutes before the meeting to get familiar with the > > > comment, etc. > > > > Yes, this sounds like a good idea. > > > > One more note: I had a look at the first comments in the list, and > > noticed that some of them have been resolved in the ODF 1.0 2nd edition > > specification already. This means that we do not only have to differ > > between the 1.0, 1.1 and 1.2 versions, but also between the 1.0 and 1.0 > > 2nd edition versions. The good news is that the number of comments we > > have to process is actually a little bit lower. > > > > An open question is how we identify those items that are resolved > > already in one of the specifications. I think we have two options. > > > > a) We (Rob, Patrick for the comments from Japan, and me) check > > immediately which items are resolved so that we can mark them as > > resolved before we process the list. > > b) We (Rob and me) check whether an item is resolved already when we set > > up the agenda. If we notice that an item is resolved, we state that in > > the agenda, but skip to the next one that is unresolved until we have 10 > > items that are not resolved yet. > > > > To be able to start with a review on Monday I suggest that we start with > > option b), but maybe switch to option a) later. > > > > Michael > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > Hope you are having a great day! > > > > > > Patrick > > > > > > Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg wrote: > > >> robert_weir@us.ibm.com wrote: > > >>> I've updated the spreadsheet listing our public comments. It is now > > >>> complete from May 1st, 2005. > > >>> We have 180 comments to go through. I expect that 100 or so have > > >>> probably > > >>> already been resolved by Patrick as overlapping with the SC34 defect > > >>> report. So maybe we have more like 80 to deal with. I'd propose > > >>> that we > > >>> try to tackle 10 of them at every TC call and plan on finishing these > > >>> within the next 8 weeks. > > >>> > > >>> Sound like a plan? Anyone have a better idea? ;-) > > >> > > >> Yes, sounds like a plan. > > >> > > >> Michael > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > > Michael Brauer, Technical Architect Software Engineering > > StarOffice/OpenOffice.org > > Sun Microsystems GmbH Nagelsweg 55 > > D-20097 Hamburg, Germany michael.brauer@sun.com > > http://sun.com/staroffice +49 40 23646 500 > > http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS > > > > Sitz der Gesellschaft: Sun Microsystems GmbH, Sonnenallee 1, > > D-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten > > Amtsgericht Muenchen: HRB 161028 > > Geschaeftsfuehrer: Thomas Schroeder, Wolfgang Engels, Dr. Roland Boemer > > Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Martin Haering -- Michael Brauer, Technical Architect Software Engineering StarOffice/OpenOffice.org Sun Microsystems GmbH Nagelsweg 55 D-20097 Hamburg, Germany michael.brauer@sun.com http://sun.com/staroffice +49 40 23646 500 http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Sitz der Gesellschaft: Sun Microsystems GmbH, Sonnenallee 1, D-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten Amtsgericht Muenchen: HRB 161028 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Thomas Schroeder, Wolfgang Engels, Dr. Roland Boemer Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Martin Haering
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]