[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] Review of some style: attributes
Oliver, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann - Software Engineer - Sun Microsystems wrote: > Hi Patrick, > > I am currently reviewing ODF 1.2 draft 7-13. > First, I am checking, if and how my comments to ODF 1.2 draft 7-9 are > considered. > > First results: > > I have noticed that my proposed change to "style:horizontal-pos" > chapter is not considered. Do you have overseen it or do you had a > reason for not considering it? > Just as a general rule it would be most helpful if everyone could quote their prior comments when asking about them. I have gotten comments in emails, incorporated as parts of the ODF drafts, etc. In this case the comment was: > - "18.750 style:horizontal-pos" > -- table 13 should be moved to sub chapter "18.751 style:horizontal-rel" The present section number (in draft 13) is: 18:748 to 18:749. Which should also include re-writing the final paragraph of 18:748, which now reads: > > The following tables display the combinations of values of the > attributes |style:horizontal-pos| and |style:horizontal-rel|. The > values of these alignment attributes are listed in the first column on > the left, and an alignment attribute value/anchor type value match is > indicated by an X. > Michael has the editing pen at the moment but I will mark this in my hard copy for changing in the next version. I don't have a specific memory of this comment but assume after reviewing it I simply overlooked it. Sorry. BTW, I looked more closely at the tables and the statement that: > The following tables display the combinations of values of the > attributes |style:horizontal-pos| and |style:horizontal-rel|. Is wrong or at least incomplete. The tables represent the permitted relationships between style:horizontal-pos (table 12) and style:horizontal-rel (table 12) and values of the text:anchor-type attribute. The first sentence should read: "Table 12 lists the permitted combinations of values for the style:horizontal-pos and text:anchor-type attributes." I would replace "any" with "all values" just to be clear. And then for table 13 we should say (separately): "Table 13 lists the permitted combinations of values for the style:horizontal-rel and text:anchor-type attributes." Yes? > I have also noticed that the approved proposal "extension of vertical > relation values for certain anchor types" is not yet integrated. But, > I think Michael is working on the integration of the approved > proposals. Right? > Yes. Hope you are at the start of a great week! Patrick > > Best regards, Oliver. > > Oliver-Rainer Wittmann - Software Engineer - Sun Microsystems wrote: >> Dear TC members, >> >> I have reviewed the following attributes in chapter 18 of our ODF 1.2 >> draft 9-10: >> >> - "18.750 style:horizontal-pos" >> -- table 13 should be moved to sub chapter "18.751 style:horizontal-rel" >> >> - "18.751 style:horizonal-rel" >> -- ok from my point of view >> >> - "18.859.1 style:vertical-pos" >> -- move sub chapter from outline level 3 to outline level 2 >> -- table 15 should be moved to sub chapter "18.860 style:vertical-rel" >> >> - "18.860 style:vertical-rel" >> -- approved proposal "extension of vertical relation values for >> certain anchor types" needs to be integrated. >> >> >> Regards, Oliver. >> > > -- Patrick Durusau patrick@durusau.net Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34 Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps) Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300 Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]