[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8
Hi Dennis, On 05.02.09 21:14, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > Michael, > > 3. I don't like the names very much, but that may be just me. I agree to Rob that we should reserve the term "strict" for something that may even be more strict than what we have today. The term "host language conformance" is a term that is used in other standards, too, and that very well characterizes this conformance level, without having to interpret terms like "strict" or "loose", which can have many meanings. So, why not use an established and "speaking" term here? Our charter says we should borrow from existing standards where possible. Why not use a term that is used in other standards, too? Best regards Michael -- Michael Brauer, Technical Architect Software Engineering StarOffice/OpenOffice.org Sun Microsystems GmbH Nagelsweg 55 D-20097 Hamburg, Germany michael.brauer@sun.com http://sun.com/staroffice +49 40 23646 500 http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Sitz der Gesellschaft: Sun Microsystems GmbH, Sonnenallee 1, D-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten Amtsgericht Muenchen: HRB 161028 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Thomas Schroeder, Wolfgang Engels, Dr. Roland Boemer Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Martin Haering
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]