OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

office message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [office] Proposal: Align IS 26300 to ODF 1.1 instead of 1.0 maintenance


Rob,

I need a couple of clarifications for my understanding, please.  (OH. And I
meant WG6.  I must have been reading too many tweets about a WG4 call being
held today.)

I don't understand the technicalities about subdivision.  What is a
subdivision and why would we need to ask for one?  Also, why would we need a
New Work Item (NP) at JTC1, with 90-day ballot for that?

Finally, you mention, in later note
<http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/201001/msg00082.html>, having
(the?) 3 months for Patrick to have the work done by throwing ODF 1.1 over
the wall, then running to the JTC1 side and catching it as WG6 Project
Editor.  Is that an essential 3 months or is it tied to the 90-day NP ballot
that you've mentioned and/or the time remaining until the WG6 face-to-face
and SC34 plenary in Stockholm?

 - Dennis

PS: I wonder if it is now possible to have ODF 1.1 and any DIFF, as needed,
submitted to SC34 enough in advance to have it available for moving forward
by WG6 and the subsequent SC34 plenary in Stockholm.


-----Original Message-----
From: robert_weir@us.ibm.com [mailto:robert_weir@us.ibm.com] 
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/201001/msg00079.html
Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 12:44
To: dennis.hamilton@acm.org
Cc: office@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [office] Proposal: Align IS 26300 to ODF 1.1 instead of 1.0
maintenance

"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> wrote on 01/07/2010 
01:38:46 PM:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/201001/msg00078.html
[ ... ]

Remember, 

> 6. We should be able to get this onto the WG4 agenda for Stockholm and
> earlier to confirm alignment between OASIS and SC34 on this approach
> (although we will probably already be in motion) to the degree that will
> also reduce procedural delays (and establish good will) at SC34 (WG4). 
> 

Two ways of doing it:  Submit an NP (new work item) to JTC1 and let them 
do a ballot on that.  Or request a subdivision at the SC Plenary.  The 
time is around the same either way, since the ballot is 3-months and the 
plenary is three months away. 

-Rob

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]