RE: [office] RE: XAdES support in ODF

[Hanssens Bart <Bart.Hanssens@fedict.be>]

Hi,

> You're right, the Configurations2\accelerator\current.xml should have been
> signed, and it was.  Oddly, they used the default transformation, but I
> guess that is tolerable considering it is a 0-length file.

The ...current.xml is indeed signed, using the default transformation because
another transformation will throw an exception (Java 6)

(Is a 0-length xml file valid XML by the way ?)


Bart