[OASIS Issue Tracker] (OFFICE-4024) Conformance clause 2.2.1 D, D3 - w or w/o namespace the same?

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

    [ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OFFICE-4024?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=72531#comment-72531 ] 

Regina Henschel commented on OFFICE-4024:
-----------------------------------------

What is the meaning of
 "are expressions determined by the prefix"
 and
 "are expressions determined by a prefix"?

The wording "determined by" is not clear to me. 

Â

Are different namespaces allowed in an attribute value (which would result in different prefixes)?

Â

[It seems, there had been a long discussion about conditions for ODF 1.2. I found e.g. OFFICE-3029 and OFFICE-3661.]

Â

> Conformance clause 2.2.1 D, D3 - w or w/o namespace the same?
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OFFICE-4024
>                 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OFFICE-4024
>             Project: OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: ODF 1.3
>            Reporter: Patrick Durusau
>            Priority: Major
>
> 2.2.1 D) D.3) reads:
> *****
> If a style:condition, table:condition, table:expression, table:formula or text:formula attribute value begins with a namespace prefix bound to namespace
> "urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns:of:1.2," the syntax and semantics of the attribute value portions that are expressions determined by the prefix shall conform to part 2 of this specification. If a namespace prefix is omitted at the beginning of the attribute value, the attribute value portions that are expressions determined by a prefix shall conform as if there were a prefix bound to namespace "urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns:of:1.2".
> *****
> It looks to me like with or without an explicit namespace prefix, the namespace is the same? Yes?
> If that is the case, why not just say absent a namespace, then ... the namespace?
> If a namespace is declared (should?) then we should say that.
> It's not clear what is meant.
> Â



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.7.2#77003)