[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] Review of ODF 1.4 Part 3 WD02
| 14:23 (vor 6 Stunden) | |||
Hi Svante, hi Regina
Â
Thank you both for your latest reviews. Regina, I have taken the liberty of assigning another batch to you (batch 11), as well as one to Svante (batch 10). See attached spreadsheet.
Â
Kind regards,
Â
Francis
Â
Â
Â
From: office@lists.oasis-open.org <office@lists.oasis-open.org> On Behalf Of Svante Schubert
Sent: 09 May 2022 13:24
To: Francis Cave <francis@franciscave.com>; Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net>
Cc: Regina Henschel <regina.henschel@libreoffice.org>; ODF TC List <office@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject: Re: [office] Review of ODF 1.4 Part 3 WD02Â
Hi Francis, Hi Patrick,
I have finished my batch.
There were three steps I took for review in general as my "fix-review-pattern":
A) Is the schema correctly changed (optional)B) Is the text of the resolution within the draft of the specification. Â
C) Is the Issue mentioned in the Appendix.
In addition to Schema Review A), I compared once the overall draft RNG with the one from ODF 1.3, if
- the issue# exists for all changes
- the issue# is written ahead of the changes
Starting with the latterÂfull review of schema
A) Schema Review - Full RNG Comparison
===================================
General remarks on the RNG changes, I did a comparison between the WD and ODF 1.3 release.
I guess Michael & Regina have already mentioned some before, just for completeness:
1) Issue after change in Line 2788 Office-3759
2) Without issue no line 4907:
    <rng:attribute name="draw:extrusion-specularity">
     <rng:ref name="percent"/>
    </rng:attribute>
3) Without issue no line 12226:
   <rng:optional>
    <rng:attribute name="style:margin-gutter">
    Â<rng:ref name="nonNegativeLength"/>
    </rng:attribute>
   </rng:optional>4) Last line too much:
   <!-- Office-4108 -->
   <rng:zeroOrMore>
    <rng:ref name="number-num-list-format"/>
   </rng:zeroOrMore>
   Â<rng:zeroOrMore>
OFFICE-4105
===========A) Review of Schema Change
Comment of issue numbers is missing in schema change (line# 12226).
Â(BTW this issue was not listed in issue review spreadsheet as schema change!)
B) Review of Specification Changes:in 19.511 style:page-usage
a) Attribute Value character style should be used for the attribute values
- at the beginning of the list
- in the later paragraphs and tables
b) Formatting of Chapter# 19.511 after the list seems odd.
in 20.322 style:margin-gutter
a) Wrong formatting in the beginning.
b) Default Value style should be used for 0 in "The default value for this attribute is 0."Â
C) Review of Appendix Entry
Issue correctly mentioned in Appendix!
OFFICE-4073
===========A) Review of Schema Changes
Schema change looks fine!  ÂÂ
B) Review of Specification Changesa) Page-content-bottom: vertical position ...
  ^^The value starts with a minor "p" not "P".
b) Above value should have the attribute-value character style! Â Â Â
c) The new value should be listed as well in the last box starting with:
    "The values of the style:vertical-rel attribute are"
    (was not part of the proposal but needs to be added!)
   Â
C) Review of Appendix Entry
Issue correctly mentioned in Appendix!
   Â
OFFICE-4033
===========A) Review of Schema Changes
No Schema change was necessary!
B) Review of Specification Changes:Changes in the spec are according to our resolution:
  https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OFFICE-4033
 Â
C) Review of Appendix Entry
Issue correctly mentioned in Appendix!Â
Kind regards,
Svante
Â
Am So., 8. Mai 2022 um 23:05ÂUhr schrieb Francis Cave <francis@franciscave.com>:
Hi Regina
Thank you for your quick work! Although it isn't specifically on the agenda for tomorrow's TC call, I think I'll await the outcome of any comments about the review process in tomorrow's call, before allocating any more of the batches.
Kind regards,
Francis
-----Original Message-----
From: office@lists.oasis-open.org <office@lists.oasis-open.org> On Behalf Of Regina Henschel
Sent: 08 May 2022 18:30
To: Francis Cave <francis@franciscave.com>
Cc: 'ODF TC List' <office@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject: Re: [office] Review of ODF 1.4 Part 3 WD02
Hi Francis,
Francis Cave schrieb am 06.05.2022 um 19:24:
> Hi Regina
>
> If/when you have time, please review batch 9 on the attached revised spreadsheet.
>
> Many thanks!
>
OASIS-4119
===========
Issue resolution field: OK
Changes in text: OK
Appendix G: Item 19.882.12Â <text:index-entry-link-end> is missing.
Schema is not affected.
OASIS-4102
==========
all OK
OASIS-3751
==========
Issue resolution field: Should have a text like "Change in schema as proposed".
Changes in text: OK
Appendix G: OK
Schema: OK
OASIS-3816
==========
Issue resolution field is empty.
Changes in text: OK
Appendix G: OK
Schema is not affected.
Kind regards,
Regina
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]