[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: Adding CC-0 to OASIS Open Projects
FWIW, the FSF recommends CC0 for public domainI remain +1.--Jim JagielskiBrief? MobileOn Jan 31, 2020, at 5:00 PM, Jim Jagielski <jimjag@gmail.com> wrote:ïOops. My mistake. I had thought that CC0 was approved. I must have been confused. In any case, since it is as close to public domain as you can get, you can consume it and relicense under something else.--Jim JagielskiBrief? MobileOn Jan 31, 2020, at 4:58 PM, Jim Jagielski <jimjag@gmail.com> wrote:ïCC0 *is* an open source License, approved by OSI. Itâs as close to public domain as you can get. I have no issues with it being officially accepted by OASIS. In fact, our policy should be that any OSI license is OK. But I can see the advantage of keeping the list down to a manageable number.--Jim JagielskiBrief? MobileOn Jan 31, 2020, at 4:32 PM, Carol Geyer <carol.geyer@oasis-open.org> wrote:ïOne of our current Open Projects needs to set up a repo under the CC-0 license, which is not one of the seven OASIS currently supports. (The OP wants to accept a major technical contribution from a large auditing firm which has a conflict-of-interest policy that requires them to only contribute under CC-0.)Before we recommend to the OASIS Board that CC-0 be added, we wanted to see if Advisory Council members have any thoughts--pro or con--on CC-0.This is very time-sensitive, so please let us know as soon as possible if you have any views on this.Many thanks,Carol--
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]