opencsa-ms message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Proposed - OpenCSA Steering Committee (StC) Proposed Agenda - 09 October2009
- From: Mike Kaiser <mkaiser@us.ibm.com>
- To: "OpenCSA Member Section" <opencsa-ms@lists.oasis-open.org>
- Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 09:33:33 -0400
PROPOSED AGENDA - OpenCSA Steering Committee
(StC) Proposed Agenda - 9 October 2009 9:00 AM PST
Call-In Information: (PLEASE NOTE
THE NEW PASSCODE BELOW)
Participant
passcode: 677139 <--- NEW PASSCODE
North
America Toll free 1-888-240-4148
Toll/International
+1-719-234-0214
London,
UK, Local +44 (0) 20 7663 2217
UK
toll free 0 800 051 6872
*6
mute/un-mute, *0 operator, *1 help
Our thanks to David Burke and TIBCO
for hosting the teleconference number.
0. Agenda bashing and Roll
1. Minutes Approval
-
11 September 2009:
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/opencsa-ms/download.php/34176/Open_CSA_SC_20090911_Draft.txt
2. Open Action Item Review and Discussion
AI20081212-001
- Coordinate an effort with Assembly TC to produce an
SCA primer as the specs approach standardization
(in review).
STATUS: On Hold until we get closer to standardization.
Keep on
hold.
Agenda for next item.
AI20090814-001
- Mike to get the status of SDO for the next
Steering Committee call.
STATUS: Not done.
AI20090911-001-
-
Sanjay to provide an initial skeleton draft for a statement
describing what a non-SCA OASIS solution would need to achieve.
-
Bob to insert IPR terms and review
-
Mike to assist in proposal review and post for next meeting's
discussion/review.
STATUS: Not done.
3. Overall TC Milestones Status as discussed
by LSC:
The
following represents the current state of each TC relative
to
Public Reviews
*
= PR 04/24 - 06/23
&
= PR 06/08 - 08/07
?
= PR 08/08 - 10/07
-
= Schedule not available at this time. (lower priority)
SCA-Assembly
TC Specifications (V1.1)
* SCA Assembly Model Specification
SCA-Policy
TC Specifications (V1.1)
* SCA Policy Framework
SCA-BPEL
TC Specifications (V1.1)
* SCA WS-BPEL Client and Implementation Specification
SCA-C/C++
TC Specifications (V1.1)
* SCA Client and Implementation Model Specification
for C
* SCA Client and Implementation Model Specification
for C++
SCA-J
TC Specifications (V1.1)
& SCA Java Common Annotations and APIs
Specification
& SCA Java Component Implementation Specification
- SCA EJB Session Bean Binding Specification
- SCA Spring Component Implementation Specification
- SCA JEE Integration Specification
SCA-Bindings
TC Specifications (V1.1)
? SCA Web Services Binding Specification
? SCA JMS Binding Specification
? SCA JCA Binding Specification
- SCA HTTP Binding Specification
SDO
TC Specifications (V3.0)
- Service Data Objects Specification
- Service Data Objects for Java
Where
are we on the Test Suite progress for each?
(i.e. Test Cases, Test Assertions) For each
- When is TC final review scheduled?
- When is vote for PR scheduled?
- When is Submission to TC Admin for
PR scheduled?
- When is PR targeted?
Public Review
dates for Test Suites (Assertions/Test Cases)
08/18 - 10/17 SCA-Assembly
??/?? - ??/?? SCA-Policy
??/?? - ??/?? SCA-Bindings
??/?? - ??/?? SCA-BPEL
??/?? - ??/?? SCA-C/C++
??/?? - ??/?? SCA-J
??/?? - ??/?? SDO
Where do
we stand on CD status with the specs with "-" in the
list
above?
-Spring
Binding CD was expected to have completed by end
of August/first week of Sept. Status?
4. Compliant implementation plans
Discussion
on hold until a TC votes a CS.
5. Response to Microsoft and Siemens
SCA-Assembly Public Review comments.
Microsoft
and Siemens (and other internal SCA members) have
raised
the question around which of the two following paths
should
be taken for claiming SCA Compliance (i.e. A or B).
A)
SCA Compliant extensions must be compliant with all of the
following:
a) SCA Assembly,
b) SCA Policy,
c) SCA Binding, and
d) at least one of the SCA Implementation
Types
(currently Java, BPEL, C or
C++ )
B)
SCA Compliant extensions must be compliant with all of the
following:
a) SCA Assembly,
b) SCA Policy and
c) SCA Binding
What
is the Steering Committee position?
Additionally,
Siemens has challenged the notion that c) should
also
not be included in the compliancy requirement.
What
is the Steering Committee position?
At
the last meeting we discussed the possibility of trying to
use
the OASIS feedback channel to have parties submit their
test
suites, conformance claims, interface descriptions, etc...
(i.e. test
materials) to the OASIS server. StC and LSC would
review these
submissions and make a call before posting approval
and making
submitted data available via a public facing OASIS
web page.
(details TBD).
This would
solve some of the fundamental characteristics which
desired,
including:
-
must have some type of document that describes, and
-
must have a reasonable test suite, and
-
must have RF IP aspects equivalent/similar to the OASIS RF IPR,
and
-
must be freely available (downloadable/accessible) to the public
7. Discussion around new Steering Committee
Secretary
8. Any Other Business?
9. Future SC Agenda Topics?
None
10. Next Meeting
-
The next regular teleconference is scheduled for
FRIDAY November 13th, 2009 9:00am PST, 12:00pm EST, 5:00pm UK
(OpenCSA
Steering Committee calls are scheduled for the second Friday
of each month.)
11. Adjourn
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]