[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Process for Revising PKI Action Plan
When and how should we revise the PKI Action Plan? I see myself as the editor here, not the author. I think the TC should decide about significant changes and I will implement the TC's wishes. Therefore, I suggest this process. People should send feedback on the Action Plan to the pki-tc email list. A day or two before each TC meeting, I'll send a summary of the changes I think need to be made to the pki-tc email list. People can discuss this on the list and at the TC meeting. And the TC can vote on what changes should be made. How does that sound? I have two concerns: 1) The volume of feedback may be larger than the pki-tc subscribers would like. If that happens, speak up and we can create a Feedback subcommittee that will be responsible for receiving and summarizing feedback. 2) We might realize that a change needs to be made quickly (before the next PKI TC meeting). If you feel this is the case, send an email saying so to the pki-tc list. We can schedule a special TC meeting or do an electronic poll. With those provisions, I'm happy with this process. What do other PKI TC members think? Thanks, Steve
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]