[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [provision] Questions...
So, does that mean that SAML + SPML = I&AML? Sorry, but I just couldn't resist ;-) Edward D. (Ed) Truitt Systems Analyst, Directory Services Global Infrastructure Delivery / Global IT Delivery ChevronTexaco Information Technology Company Ph# +1 281.596-3246 Fax# +1 281.596-2714 Cell phone / Pager # +1 832.443-7283 "Got IT?" -----Original Message----- From: Christopher Ferris [mailto:chris.ferris@sun.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 3:30 PM To: Keith Cosgrove Cc: provision@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [provision] Questions... Ohhh, it could be pronounced "SPAM-L" ;-) Cheers, Chris But I don't *like* spam! Keith Cosgrove wrote: > Agree - Services Provisioning ML > > Also - With a quick search on Google of SPML there appears to be only > one contention "Server Parsed ML" > http://foldoc.doc.ic.ac.uk/foldoc/foldoc.cgi?SPML > > However, this is dated 1996-09-29, and probably isnt any real concern > at all. > > KC > keith@cp.net > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Gavenraj Sodhi [mailto:gsodhi1@home.com] > Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 1:10 PM > To: provision@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: RE: [provision] Questions... > > > Shouldn't it be Services Provisioning ML? As their may exist one or > more services being provisioned within an instance. > > -Gavenraj > gsodhi1@home.com > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Darran Rolls [mailto:Darran.Rolls@waveset.com] > Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 12:29 PM > To: Bill Games; provision@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: RE: [provision] Questions... > > I think Don Bowens revelations on the possible abuse of the acronym > for the PSTC specification has certainly convinced me personally that > SPML is a better option. Are there any other suggestions before we > put this to a vote? > > -------------------------------------------------------- > Darran Rolls http://www.waveset.com > Waveset Technologies Inc drolls@waveset.com > (512) 657 8360 PGP 0x8AC67C6F > -------------------------------------------------------- > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bill Games [mailto:bgames@sig.net] > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 10:17 AM > To: provision@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: RE: [provision] Questions... > > Does anyone perceive a difference between these acronyms? > SPML - Service Provisioning ML > PSML - Provisioning Services ML > > The first suggests a focus on describing the intrinsic attributes of a > service that is -to be- provisioned by an SPML compatible provisioning > engine or controller. In other words, what is the standard structure > of the messages sent to and from an SPML compatible provisioning > engine that result in the intended service being provisioned on the > target service delivery platform? > > The second suggests there is a list of generic, universal provisioning > services. In this case, I read 'provisioning' as an adjective. I'm > not sure that gets us anything. BTW, English grammar is not my > specialty. > > > Any other thoughts... > > Bill Games > Signet Web Partners > (512) 327-9346 > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Darran Rolls [mailto:Darran.Rolls@waveset.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 8:23 PM > To: provision@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: RE: [provision] Questions... > > > Of course... > > If there are other suggestions send them to the list and I'll set up a > quick Evite pole.... > > -djr > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Darran Rolls > Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 8:12 PM > To: 'Truitt, Edward D. (OSED)'; 'provision@lists.oasis-open.org' > Subject: RE: [provision] Questions... > > At Hal's request I have added an agenda item for the next meeting to > ratify the Provisioning Services Markup Language (PSML) as the > umbrella name for the specification.... > > Darran Rolls > Waveset Technologies > MSIM drolls_waveset@hotmail.com > AIM drollswaveset > YIM drolls_waveset > http://www.waveset.com/ > drolls@waveset.com > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Truitt, Edward D. (OSED) [mailto:OSED@chevrontexaco.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 5:39 PM > To: 'provision@lists.oasis-open.org' > Subject: RE: [provision] Questions... > > That sounds good to me. In fact, that allows us to use "Provisioning > Services" instead of simply "Provisioning". > > -Ed Truitt > > -----Original Message----- > From: Darran Rolls [mailto:Darran.Rolls@waveset.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 4:37 PM > To: Winston Bumpus; provision@lists.oasis-open.org; > MChanliau@netegrity.com > Subject: RE: [provision] Questions... > > > Re 1. I guess the provisioning "framework" would be called PSML - at > least that was the agreed name before November 12th. Is everyone > still happy with > that? > > Darran Rolls > Waveset Technologies > MSIM drolls_waveset@hotmail.com > AIM drollswaveset > YIM drolls_waveset > http://www.waveset.com/ > drolls@waveset.com > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Winston Bumpus [mailto:WBUMPUS@novell.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 1:29 PM > To: provision@lists.oasis-open.org; MChanliau@netegrity.com > Subject: Re: [provision] Questions... > > Marc, > > As for the DSML relevance, there is a presumption at this point that > some of the information will be maintained in a directory, the use of > new XML protocols for directory interaction may be relevant to this > activity. > > Winston > > >>>>"Chanliau, Marc" <MChanliau@netegrity.com> 11/28/01 11:07AM >>> >>>> > I'm new to this TC (I'm a SAML TC member), so please bear with my > basic > questions: > > (1) Is there a name for the framework defined by the PSTC (for > example, the Security Services TC (SSTC) defines the SAML framework)? > (2) In the document called "An Introduction to the Provisioning Services > Technical Committee," there's a nice representation of the other > standards > supported. While I can easily understand the relevance of SOAP > (messaging), > SAML (authN and attributes), and XML sig and encryption, I fail to see > the > relevance of DSML. Can you explain? > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> > ---------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC