[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: [provision] PSTC Charter Revisions
Note: Apologies for a duplicate email but I wanted to make sure that the revisions are properly presented for readability so I am submitting it also in PDF format. All, I would like to submit the following revisions to be considered for the SPML charter: For the first section below, #1-5, we would recommend that the #5 (Request and response for specific provisioning requests) is the main issue of provisioning, between two parties. #1-4 can be summarized as querying and exchanging available provisioning capabilities, also, may be specific cases of #5. For the next section below, #1-3, we agree with #1 & 2. SPML should not be limited to a single organization. As an example (an entirely separate use case, and even assuming we have a pre-trust between organizations): If party A is talking to party B, then talking to party C. May be resolved by separate transaction IDs for each party but it just makes our charter way too complex. Party A would have to know about Party C, just too complex for the basis of our charter. Thus, we are not in support of item #3. I'd like to propose the following modified version for the charter: Attached: PDF Format <<PSTC Charter Revisions.pdf>> -Gavenraj Sodhi
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC