[regrep] Re: Core Components Specifications

[Duane Nickull <duane@xmlglobal.com>]

Philip Goatly wrote:
> 
> Folks,
> 
>  I remember when IT was called dataprocessing - Well CC represents data and
> nedd to be bound to process/es
>>>>>>>>>

I concur.  That is why we have a bunch of really smart people working
out the processes in the BP related teams.  They liaise with the CC
teams so we get this functionality.

I still assert:

"If you model your information and processes properly, you should end up
with all the information properly separated from the processes.  "nouns"
in the core components and all the "verbs" in the processes.  Anything
less MAY be a mistake in the modelling."

I would like to hear from the UMM and UML heads to see if they agree
with this notion. (no flames please)
\
Duane
-- 
CTO, XML Global Technologies
****************************
Transformation - http://www.xmlglobal.com/prod/foundation/
ebXML Central - http://www.xmlglobal.com/prod/central/