[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [regrep] WSDL Issues
I think it's wonderful of Anne to help us out here. Thanks Anne! Anne Thomas Manes wrote: > > I recommend using the proposed WSDL 1.2 binding (although it may go away in > the future). > IBM has published a schema for a MIME binding [1]. Thanks. I'll go revise > the WSDL based on this info. > > [1] http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/mime/ > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Farrukh Najmi" <farrukh.najmi@sun.com> > To: "Anne Thomas Manes" <anne@manes.net> > Cc: <regrep@lists.oasis-open.org>; "matt" <matt@yellowdragonsoft.com> > Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 10:02 PM > Subject: Re: [regrep] WSDL Issues > > > Anne Thomas Manes wrote: > > > > >Some questions and comments: > > > > > > > > >If partContent is required to be included in the input message, why is it > > >not included in the message structure? Also, keep in mind that WS-I BP > > >permits only one <part> on document/literal messages, so to be WS-I > > >compliant, you would have to include it in the message structure. > > > > > >One reason why you might want to define multiple parts in a message > > >definition is to define header or headerfault messages (which should > always > > >be defined as document/literal) -- but in that case you should always > > >reference the specific part to be used in the <binding> elements. e.g.: > > > > > > <message name='foo'> > > > <part name='body' element='foobody' /> > > > <part name='header' element='fooheader' /> > > > <part name='headerfault' element='fooheaderfault' /> > > > </message> > > > > > > <soap:body parts='body' use='literal' /> > > > <soap:header message='tns:foo' part='header' use='literal' /> > > > <soap:headerfault message='tns:foo' part='headerfault' use='literal' > /> > > > > > >Bottom line: the three messages containing partContent have to be fixed. > > > > > > > > > > > Anne, the messages with partContent are those that are supposed to > > support mime attachments. Clearly we seem to have lost > > > > <mime:multipartRelated> > > > > in the input and output element defs for these operations. I suspect > > this was silently swallowed by a tool I used. I will doublecheck this. > > > > I know that WS-I BP does not touch attachments. Are there any other > > considerations besides just following? > > > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-wsdl12-bindings-20030611/#_mime > > > > > > > > -- > > Farrukh > > > > > > > > You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/leave_workgroup. > php > > > > You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/leave_workgroup.php
begin:vcard n:Chiusano;Joseph tel;work:(703) 902-6923 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:www.bah.com org:Booz | Allen | Hamilton;IT Digital Strategies Team adr:;;8283 Greensboro Drive;McLean;VA;22012; version:2.1 email;internet:chiusano_joseph@bah.com title:Senior Consultant fn:Joseph M. Chiusano end:vcard
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]