[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [saml-dev] Re: RE : [saml-dev] Which version to use?
Jean-Noël Colin wrote on 11/9/2004, 5:37 AM: > Dear Anastase, > > Thank you for your email. My question was more: as SAML 2.0 now > includes ID-FF, and, from the previous discussion, ID-FF is now a > dead-end, what will be the status of ID-WSF? Will it be integrated in a > later release of SAML? Will it exist as a stand-alone specification on > top of saml 2.0? ID-WSF will continue its march forward and will support both SAML 1.x (Liberty ID-FF) and SAML 2.x assertions. ID-WSF is a very different scope from SAML, so I doubt that there will be a convergence there, although as I said, ID-WSF will use SAML 2.0 assertions. Conor
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]