[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [saml-dev] Artifact Format
> Yes, I could not find anything in the conformance doc also. It's missing. The intent was that type 0x04 is MTI. > So, I could define > Artifact = [Typecode MyFooBar(nn)] > Where TypeCode := 0x0100 (e..g) No. All SAML 2.0 artifacts have an index field. The part after the index is open. Furthermore, there isn't a formal registry of artifact type codes, which means there is no guarantee you won't step on somebody else. Finally, it's just generally a bad thing IMHO. What does your artifact do that requires its own type? -- Scott
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]