OASIS Mailing List Archives
View the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using
MarkMail
.
This list only
All OASIS lists
Help:
OASIS Mailing Lists Help
|
MarkMail Help
sca-assembly
148 messages in this archive
(listed by date, most recent first)
|
Thread Index
|
List Home
RE: [sca-assembly] Composition Question
From
"Peshev, Peter" <peter.peshev@sap.com> on 27 Feb 2008 15:28:01 -0000
RE: [sca-assembly] Composition Question
From
"Michael Rowley" <mrowley@bea.com> on 27 Feb 2008 14:10:35 -0000
RE: [sca-assembly] Composition Question
From
"Peshev, Peter" <peter.peshev@sap.com> on 27 Feb 2008 09:07:00 -0000
[sca-assembly] Composition Question
From
Mark Hapner <Mark.Hapner@Sun.COM> on 26 Feb 2008 23:24:49 -0000
RE: [opencsa-liaison] RE: [sca-assembly] Namespaces and Specification CDs....
From
"Mary McRae" <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> on 26 Feb 2008 22:04:12 -0000
Re: [opencsa-liaison] RE: [sca-assembly] Namespaces and SpecificationCDs....
From
ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 26 Feb 2008 21:36:07 -0000
RE: [sca-assembly] Namespaces and Specification CDs....
From
"Mary McRae" <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> on 26 Feb 2008 21:10:37 -0000
RE: [sca-assembly] Namespaces and Specification CDs....
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 26 Feb 2008 20:45:25 -0000
RE: [sca-assembly] Namespaces and Specification CDs....
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 26 Feb 2008 17:36:11 -0000
RE: [sca-assembly] Namespaces and Specification CDs....
From
"Martin Chapman" <martin.chapman@oracle.com> on 26 Feb 2008 16:27:52 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 49: Add an optional description attribute topromoted properties, references and services
From
Dieter Koenig1 <dieterkoenig@de.ibm.com> on 26 Feb 2008 16:10:10 -0000
RE: [sca-assembly] Namespaces and Specification CDs....
From
"Martin Chapman" <martin.chapman@oracle.com> on 26 Feb 2008 16:01:09 -0000
RE: [sca-assembly] Namespaces and Specification CDs....
From
"Martin Chapman" <martin.chapman@oracle.com> on 26 Feb 2008 15:50:57 -0000
RE: [sca-assembly] Namespaces and Specification CDs....
From
"Mary McRae" <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> on 26 Feb 2008 15:17:56 -0000
RE: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 16: Component URI is not well described
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 26 Feb 2008 14:33:13 -0000
RE: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 8: SCDL artifact resolution underspecified
From
"Michael Rowley" <mrowley@bea.com> on 26 Feb 2008 13:48:51 -0000
RE: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 16: Component URI is not well described
From
"Michael Rowley" <mrowley@bea.com> on 26 Feb 2008 13:40:43 -0000
Fw: [chairs] Warning - US Daylight Savings time and European Summer timediscrepancy
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 26 Feb 2008 10:49:58 -0000
Namespaces and Specification CDs....
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 26 Feb 2008 10:02:22 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 40: Autowire at the domain-level
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 26 Feb 2008 09:38:57 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 26 Feb 2008 09:30:22 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 16: Component URI is not well described
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 26 Feb 2008 09:25:54 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 40: Autowire at the domain-level
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 26 Feb 2008 09:22:35 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] Issue 17 proposal
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 26 Feb 2008 08:34:12 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 8: SCDL artifact resolution underspecified
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 26 Feb 2008 08:18:06 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 49: Add an optional description attributeto promoted properties, references and services
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 26 Feb 2008 07:20:27 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 40: Autowire at the domain-level
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 26 Feb 2008 07:05:03 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 16: Component URI is not well described
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 26 Feb 2008 06:59:03 -0000
RE: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 16: Component URI is not well described
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 26 Feb 2008 03:08:50 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 40: Autowire at the domain-level
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 26 Feb 2008 02:06:08 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] Groups - sca-assembly-1.1-spec-WD-03.doc uploaded
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 26 Feb 2008 02:01:05 -0000
ISSUE 52: @ImplementationRef on Service or Reference to identify appropriate parts of the implementation
From
Scott Vorthmann <scottv@tibco.com> on 26 Feb 2008 00:59:34 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 40: Autowire at the domain-level
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 25 Feb 2008 21:48:50 -0000
RE: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 16: Component URI is not well described
From
"Michael Rowley" <mrowley@bea.com> on 25 Feb 2008 20:11:31 -0000
OASIS SCA Assembly TC Agenda 26 Feb
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 25 Feb 2008 12:11:04 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 25 Feb 2008 12:07:53 -0000
RE: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 16: Component URI is not well described
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 25 Feb 2008 10:10:37 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 51: Composite Completeness
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 22 Feb 2008 20:24:34 -0000
Issue 33 Proposal
From
Dieter Koenig1 <dieterkoenig@de.ibm.com> on 22 Feb 2008 16:33:39 -0000
RE: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 16: Component URI is not well described
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 22 Feb 2008 15:31:15 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] Issue 17 proposal
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 22 Feb 2008 14:00:04 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] Groups - sca-assembly-1.1-spec-WD-03.doc uploaded
From
Bryan Aupperle <aupperle@us.ibm.com> on 22 Feb 2008 13:39:30 -0000
NEW ISSUE: @ImplementationRef on Service or Reference to identify appropriate parts of the implementation
From
"Michael Rowley" <mrowley@bea.com> on 21 Feb 2008 19:53:53 -0000
RE: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 16: Component URI is not well described
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 21 Feb 2008 11:35:10 -0000
RE: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 16: Component URI is not well described
From
"Michael Rowley" <mrowley@bea.com> on 20 Feb 2008 19:45:31 -0000
RE: [sca-assembly] Issue 8 (was: Issue 17 proposal)
From
"Michael Rowley" <mrowley@bea.com> on 20 Feb 2008 19:23:57 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly Testing Con call modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 20 Feb 2008 14:41:26 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 20 Feb 2008 13:22:48 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 20 Feb 2008 13:21:23 -0000
RE: [sca-assembly] Issue 8 (was: Issue 17 proposal)
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 20 Feb 2008 12:10:40 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 16: Component URI is not well described
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 20 Feb 2008 11:46:32 -0000
RE: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 8: SCDL artifact resolution underspecified
From
"Michael Rowley" <mrowley@bea.com> on 19 Feb 2008 20:00:45 -0000
RE: [sca-assembly] Issue 8 (was: Issue 17 proposal)
From
"Michael Rowley" <mrowley@bea.com> on 19 Feb 2008 19:58:25 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] Issue 17 proposal
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 19 Feb 2008 19:52:04 -0000
Draft Minutes of SCA-Assembly meeting of 2008-02-19 are attached
From
Bob Freund <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 19 Feb 2008 17:31:09 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 8: SCDL artifact resolution underspecified
From
Scott Vorthmann <scottv@tibco.com> on 19 Feb 2008 17:07:58 -0000
RE: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 8: SCDL artifact resolution underspecified
From
"Michael Rowley" <mrowley@bea.com> on 19 Feb 2008 16:50:35 -0000
ISSUE 51: Composite Completeness
From
Scott Vorthmann <scottv@tibco.com> on 19 Feb 2008 16:24:54 -0000
ISSUE 50: default binding for callback
From
Scott Vorthmann <scottv@tibco.com> on 19 Feb 2008 16:22:22 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] Issue 17 proposal
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 19 Feb 2008 16:21:00 -0000
ISSUE 49: Add an optional description attribute to promoted properties, references and services
From
Scott Vorthmann <scottv@tibco.com> on 19 Feb 2008 16:19:07 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Composite Completeness
From
"Michael Rowley" <mrowley@bea.com> on 19 Feb 2008 15:17:14 -0000
ISSUE 16: Component URI is not well described
From
"Michael Rowley" <mrowley@bea.com> on 19 Feb 2008 14:37:10 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] Issue 17 proposal
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 19 Feb 2008 08:38:36 -0000
Groups - sca-assembly-1.1-spec-WD-03.pdf uploaded
From
Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com on 19 Feb 2008 05:51:25 -0000
Groups - sca-assembly-1.1-spec-WD-03.doc uploaded
From
Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com on 19 Feb 2008 05:50:29 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] Issue 19: resolution clarification
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 19 Feb 2008 05:36:15 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] Issue 17 proposal
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 19 Feb 2008 05:21:53 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 18 Feb 2008 15:54:07 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly Testing Con call modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 18 Feb 2008 15:47:11 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 17 Feb 2008 19:12:52 -0000
Draft Minutes of 2008-02-12 are attached
From
Bob Freund <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 17 Feb 2008 17:59:12 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] Issue 19: resolution clarification
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 16 Feb 2008 15:42:33 -0000
Groups - sca-assembly-1.1-spec-WD-03.pdf uploaded
From
Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com on 16 Feb 2008 08:04:42 -0000
Groups - sca-assembly-1.1-spec-WD-03.doc uploaded
From
Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com on 16 Feb 2008 08:03:30 -0000
NEW ISSUE: default binding for callback
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 16 Feb 2008 00:56:02 -0000
Issue 19: resolution clarification
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 16 Feb 2008 00:36:40 -0000
Incorrect issue numbers in the initial description
From
Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com on 15 Feb 2008 21:57:30 -0000
Incorrect issue numbers in the initial description
From
Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com on 15 Feb 2008 21:56:50 -0000
Security bug in JIRA
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@ORACLE.COM> on 15 Feb 2008 21:54:18 -0000
Groups - sca-assembly-1.1-spec-WD-03.pdf uploaded
From
Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com on 15 Feb 2008 21:45:09 -0000
Groups - sca-assembly-1.1-spec-WD-03.doc uploaded
From
Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com on 15 Feb 2008 21:44:18 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Add an optional description attribute to promoted properties, references and services
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 13 Feb 2008 11:10:04 -0000
RE: [sca-assembly] Re: ISSUE 8: SCDL artifact resolution underspecified (schema adjustments for uniqueness?)
From
"Michael Rowley" <mrowley@bea.com> on 12 Feb 2008 20:02:30 -0000
ISSUE 48: Defaulting composite reference targets to internal components
From
Scott Vorthmann <scottv@tibco.com> on 12 Feb 2008 16:11:56 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Defaulting composite reference targets to internal components
From
"Michael Rowley" <mrowley@bea.com> on 12 Feb 2008 14:46:27 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 12 Feb 2008 14:03:57 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 12 Feb 2008 14:02:57 -0000
ISSUE 28: Missing XSD for contributions: PROPOSAL
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 12 Feb 2008 13:50:10 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] Re: ISSUE 8: SCDL artifact resolution underspecified (schemaadjustments for uniqueness?)
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 12 Feb 2008 13:43:09 -0000
RE: [sca-assembly] Re: ISSUE 8: SCDL artifact resolution underspecified (schemaadjustments for uniqueness?)
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 12 Feb 2008 13:34:21 -0000
ISSUE 22: WSDL extension should not be required for conversations -proposal
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 12 Feb 2008 12:47:40 -0000
ISSUE 25: Can implementation change property values after instantiation: PROPOSAL
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 12 Feb 2008 12:23:07 -0000
ISSUE 5: Component type allows to specify wire targets on references: PROPOSAL
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 12 Feb 2008 12:12:14 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] Simplifying Clarification of Bidirectional Interface tohelp resolve SCA Assembly Issue 4
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 12 Feb 2008 09:54:47 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] Re: ISSUE 8: SCDL artifact resolution underspecified (schemaadjustments for uniqueness?)
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 12 Feb 2008 09:52:56 -0000
RE: [sca-assembly] Re: ISSUE 8: SCDL artifact resolution underspecified (schemaadjustments for uniqueness?)
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 12 Feb 2008 09:44:51 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] issues up-to-date
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 12 Feb 2008 08:34:35 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 12 Feb 2008 08:32:32 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 12 Feb 2008 08:31:10 -0000
Meetings Scheduled for the Assembly Test subcommittee
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 12 Feb 2008 07:50:39 -0000
Draft formatted minutes of 2008-02-05 are attached
From
Bob Freund <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 12 Feb 2008 03:10:01 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] Simplifying Clarification of Bidirectional Interfaceto help resolve SCA Assembly Issue 4
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 12 Feb 2008 00:55:20 -0000
issues up-to-date
From
Scott Vorthmann <scottv@tibco.com> on 12 Feb 2008 00:03:50 -0000
RE: [sca-assembly] Re: ISSUE 8: SCDL artifact resolution underspecified (schema adjustments for uniqueness?)
From
"Moberg Dale" <dmoberg@axway.com> on 11 Feb 2008 22:47:51 -0000
RE: ISSUE 8: SCDL artifact resolution underspecified (schema adjustments for uniqueness?)
From
"Michael Rowley" <mrowley@bea.com> on 11 Feb 2008 22:37:28 -0000
Re: ISSUE 8: SCDL artifact resolution underspecified (schema adjustmentsfor uniqueness?)
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 11 Feb 2008 21:54:10 -0000
ISSUE 47: Interface element needs an operation child element
From
Scott Vorthmann <scottv@tibco.com> on 11 Feb 2008 17:44:33 -0000
ISSUE 8: SCDL artifact resolution underspecified (schema adjustments for uniqueness?)
From
"Moberg Dale" <dmoberg@axway.com> on 11 Feb 2008 17:26:00 -0000
RE: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 8: SCDL artifact resolution underspecified
From
"Michael Rowley" <mrowley@bea.com> on 11 Feb 2008 15:46:05 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly Testing Con call added
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 11 Feb 2008 10:46:06 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 8: SCDL artifact resolution underspecified
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 8 Feb 2008 23:04:45 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 8: SCDL artifact resolution underspecified
From
Jim Marino <jmarino@bea.com> on 8 Feb 2008 11:04:29 -0000
RE: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 8: SCDL artifact resolution underspecified
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 8 Feb 2008 09:28:23 -0000
RE: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 8: SCDL artifact resolution underspecified
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 8 Feb 2008 00:01:41 -0000
RE: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 8: SCDL artifact resolution underspecified
From
"Michael Rowley" <mrowley@bea.com> on 7 Feb 2008 22:26:32 -0000
RE: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 8: SCDL artifact resolution underspecified
From
"Moberg Dale" <dmoberg@axway.com> on 7 Feb 2008 20:48:04 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 8: SCDL artifact resolution underspecified
From
Jim Marino <jmarino@bea.com> on 7 Feb 2008 10:53:59 -0000
RE: [sca-assembly] [NEW ISSUE]: Interface element needs an operation childelement
From
Bryan Aupperle <aupperle@us.ibm.com> on 6 Feb 2008 19:22:22 -0000
RE: [sca-assembly] [NEW ISSUE]: Interface element needs an operation child element
From
"Michael Rowley" <mrowley@bea.com> on 6 Feb 2008 19:04:56 -0000
RE: [sca-assembly] Issue 17 proposal
From
"Michael Rowley" <mrowley@bea.com> on 6 Feb 2008 18:56:43 -0000
RE: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 8: SCDL artifact resolution underspecified
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 6 Feb 2008 15:47:55 -0000
RE: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 8: SCDL artifact resolution underspecified
From
"Michael Rowley" <mrowley@bea.com> on 5 Feb 2008 22:14:41 -0000
RE: ISSUE 41: Conflicting domain-level <wire> deployments
From
"Michael Rowley" <mrowley@bea.com> on 5 Feb 2008 21:20:05 -0000
[NEW ISSUE]: Interface element needs an operation child element
From
Bryan Aupperle <aupperle@us.ibm.com> on 5 Feb 2008 21:15:41 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] Issue 17 proposal
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 5 Feb 2008 20:53:06 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] raw minutes for Telecon - 05 Feb 2008
From
Bob Freund <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 5 Feb 2008 19:38:11 -0000
RE: [sca-assembly] raw minutes for Telecon - 05 Feb 2008
From
"Martin Chapman" <martin.chapman@oracle.com> on 5 Feb 2008 18:47:19 -0000
Re: [sca-assembly] Issue 17 proposal
From
Scott Vorthmann <scottv@tibco.com> on 5 Feb 2008 17:19:06 -0000
raw minutes for Telecon - 05 Feb 2008
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 5 Feb 2008 17:04:01 -0000
ISSUE 46: Dynamic Aspects of the Domain not adequately described in the Assembly Specification
From
Scott Vorthmann <scottv@tibco.com> on 5 Feb 2008 16:13:17 -0000
RE: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 18: Proposal to resolve Issue 18
From
"David DiFranco" <ddifranc@bea.com> on 5 Feb 2008 14:52:39 -0000
RE: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 18: Proposal to resolve Issue 18
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 5 Feb 2008 11:51:33 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 5 Feb 2008 10:01:35 -0000
Issue 17 proposal
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 5 Feb 2008 08:33:53 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 4 Feb 2008 22:13:48 -0000
RE: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 18: Proposal to resolve Issue 18
From
"David DiFranco" <ddifranc@bea.com> on 4 Feb 2008 21:45:12 -0000
RE: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 18: Proposal to resolve Issue 18
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 4 Feb 2008 21:41:33 -0000
Simplifying Clarification of Bidirectional Interface to help resolveSCA Assembly Issue 4
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 4 Feb 2008 18:09:08 -0000
RE: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 18: Proposal to resolve Issue 18
From
"David DiFranco" <ddifranc@bea.com> on 4 Feb 2008 16:23:15 -0000
ISSUE 23: Proposal for Issue 23
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 4 Feb 2008 16:11:41 -0000
[NEW ISSUE] Dynamic Aspects of the Domain not adequately described in theAssembly Specification
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 4 Feb 2008 14:48:13 -0000
ISSUE 18: Proposal to resolve Issue 18
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 4 Feb 2008 14:39:11 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly TC F2F meeting modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 4 Feb 2008 12:06:32 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly TC F2F meeting modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 4 Feb 2008 12:05:19 -0000
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 4 Feb 2008 12:01:02 -0000
Improved Draft minutes from 2008-01-29 are attached, now with roll included
From
Bob Freund <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 3 Feb 2008 02:04:26 -0000
Draft Minutes from 2008-01-29 are attached
From
Bob Freund <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 3 Feb 2008 01:57:31 -0000
Mail converted by
MHonArc
2.5.0b2