OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

sca-j message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: CD candidate for javacaa spec uploaded


I have uploaded the doc and pdf versions of WD04:
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-j/download.php/29077/sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-WD04.doc
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-j/download.php/29078/sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-WD04.pdf

The pdf version is non-diffed. If you want to see the diff, use the doc 
version and enable the change-marking 'on the screen'.

When commenting if you need to use line numbers, pl. do so using the pdf 
version and not the doc version.

For this draft, I went through the issues list and applied resolutions 
of all the issues against this spec whose status was 'resolved'. I have 
updated JIRA for those issues as well.

The changes for this draft from the last draft are:
1) applied resolutions of issues 12, 22, 23, 29, 31,
35, 36, 37, 44, 45
2) reapplied resolution of issue 9 as it wasn't done correctly
3) updated the NS

Resolutions of issues 4, 11, 26, 33 were already applied before. Issue 
33 resolution was applied before but not noted in the 'Revision History' 
section.

So, if we were to accept this draft as a CD, it would mean that the 
following issues can be closed:
4, 9, 11, 12, 22, 23, 26, 29, 31, 33, 35, 36, 37, 44, 45

I do have two comments:
1) For issue 37 I removed all statements that had restrictions wrt 
access modifiers, per the resolution. But I did not add a statement that 
there is no restriction wrt access modifers. Do we need that?
2) For issue 44, there was no explicit text for @Destroy in the issue 
resolution. Please make sure that I got it right.

Thanks.

-Anish
--


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]