[glossary] interesting finding while parsing the glossary

[Jay Nash <jay@o-ms.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Folks,

I decided to use a text analysis script to compare the terms we have
used in the Requirements Documentation (v.04) with the terms we are
defining in the glossary.  It turned up some interesting data (short list)

Artifact(s) = 3 uses
Baseline Configuration = 0 uses
Composition = as a noun, 3 uses
Configure = 0 uses
Default Configuration = 0 uses

My understanding of the group consensus is that if we are not using the
term within the SDD, then we probably don't want to spend time defining
it our paperwork.

As such, I propose that any terms with ZERO use in the requirements
document be expunged from the glossary.  If we need them later, we can
always add them back in.

Regards,
Jay Nash

- --
- --
Jay Nash, CTO
OMS SafeHarbor
128 Warren St
Lowell MA 01852
978.937.2363 ext.111
978.937.3784 fax

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is
protected by law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you should
delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure,
copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action
based on it, is strictly prohibited.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFD2RHJHsIa/RmVc78RAi6kAJsE4duWL76HIIcFfY/Vk4Y/vFxNeACfc6/O
BdpMUmUl3jiviwjiwLMUtrY=
=6a4R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----