security-services message

Subject: Re: [security-services] Official statement to W3C WG about impact on SAML?

From: "Cantor, Scott" <cantor.2@osu.edu>
To: Nicole Roy <nroy@internet2.edu>, Hal Lockhart <harold.w.lochhart@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2023 16:02:58 +0000

> Thanks, Scott, I agree. FWIW, Tim Cappalli at Micorosft and Heather Flanagan
> (independent) are hoping to spin up a formal W3C working group around this
> stuff. Should we maybe coordinate our messaging with Tim and Heather to see
> if we can use this as impetus for W3C to honor their request?

It would be ideal of course to include language in the charter in fact.

-- Scott

References:
- Re: [security-services] Official statement to W3C WG about impact on SAML?
  - From: Nicole Roy <nroy@internet2.edu>
- Re: [security-services] Official statement to W3C WG about impact on SAML?
  - From: "Cantor, Scott" <cantor.2@osu.edu>
- Re: [security-services] Official statement to W3C WG about impact on SAML?
  - From: Nicole Roy <nroy@internet2.edu>