ubl-dev message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: UML meta-modeling of UN/CEFACT Core Components
- From: "Bruno TRAVERSON" <bruno.traverson@edf.fr>
- To: ubl-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, "jon.bosak" <jon.bosak@sun.com>,"mcrawford" <mcrawford@lmi.org>
- Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 18:58:31 +0200
Hello,
I am currently working on UML meta-modeling of UN/CEFACT Core Components.
I have looked at the valuable work done in your XML implementation of UN/CEFACT Core Components.
I have noticed some differences between the UML specification done by UN/CEFACT (version 2.01
- 15 November 2003) and your XML implementation - for instance, a Basic BIE has no Dictionary Entry Name
in the UN/CEFACT specification and a DateType has a FormatText attribute that does not exist in your implementation.
These differences may be due to the fact you are using a different version of the specification or due
to the manual transformation from an UML specification to an XML implementation ;-)
UML meta-modeling may be a good solution to seamlessly translate the UML specification into an XML
specification.
Are you aware of other people working on that topic? I would be glad to exchange viewpoints with them.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Bruno Traverson
EDF R&D
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]