[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Réf. : RE: UML meta-modeling of UN/CEFACT Core Components
MCRAWFORD@lmi.org on 04/08/2004 18:01:31 Pour : Bruno TRAVERSON/IMA/DER/EDFGDF/FR@EDFGDF, ubl-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, jon.bosak@sun.com cc : Objet : RE: UML meta-modeling of UN/CEFACT Core Components Bruno, Please cite exactly where in ccts a dictionary entry name is not required for a BBIE. *** *** sorry it was not the good example;-( *** *** but, if we consider a BBIE: *** *** - according to ccts 2.01, it has 5 attributes inherited from RegistryClass: *** o UniqueIdentifier [1] *** o DictionaryEntryName [1] *** o Definition [1] *** o Version [1] *** o UsageRule [0..*] *** and 3 attributes inherited from BIE: *** o BusinessTerm [0..*] *** o ConstraintLanguage [0..*] *** o Example [0..*] *** *** - according UBL 1.0 (extract from CoreComponentsParameters.xsd), it has 8 attributes: *** o DictionaryEntryName [1] *** o QualifierObjectClassTerm [0..1] *** o ObjectClassTerm [0..1] *** o QualifierPropertyTerm [0..1] *** o PropertyTerm [1] *** o RepresentationTerm [1] *** o BusinessTerm [0..1] *** o Definition [1] *** *** it is perhaps a misinterpretation of one of the two specifications (or both!), but *** it seems to me that the specifications are aligned only on DictionaryEntryName (too bad!) *** and Definition attributes... *** *** sorry again for the confusion. *** *** Regards, *** Bruno
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]