[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ubl-dev] XML Name and Address Structure [NAD]
Steven, Suggest you talk to Margaret Pemberton. Mark Mark Crawford SAP Standards Architect Office: 703 670-0920 Mobile: 703 485-5232 ---------------------------------------------------------- Chair UN/CEFACT Applied Technologies Group Lead, UN/CEFACT XML NDR Standard Lead, UN/CEFACT Core Components Harmonization Project Co-Chair, ISO TC154 Core Components > -----Original Message----- > From: Stephen GOULD [mailto:stephen.gould@halisa.net] > Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 1:15 PM > To: ubl-dev@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: [ubl-dev] XML Name and Address Structure [NAD] > > Hi - has anyone have any comments on the UN/CEFACT Name > and Address Structure that I could pass on to these groups ? > > This group of IT Experts have been reviewing whether the two XML > address formats in the Australian eCommerce Standard AS 4590 > can be simplified to one format only. > > it appears that UN/EDIFACT also has two EDI Structures in the > Address Format. > > Can this also be simplified to a single Address format ? > > Regards > > Stephen GOULD > > 11:22 Wed 13 Dec 2006 > REF:ZXSARCF1 > > Y/R: AS 4590 > TO: IT Expert eReview Committee cc UN/CEFACT > Name & Address Structure > Standards Australia > AUS ECOMMERCE STANDARDS Interested Parties > > Hi - Thank you for taking the time to review the current AS 4590 > Structure and submitting your responses. > > ALL the responses received confirm that the simplex version for the > Name and Address format of AS 4590 can be replaced by the > Complex Version ! > > Not only that Joost confirmed that a structured format is required > for effective data mining - two responses placed on home page > http://www.oic.org > > REVIEW UN/CEFACT - POSSIBLE UN/CEFACT SUPPORT > > In addition we have reviewed the UN/CEFACT eTrade documents > stipulated in the Port of Melbourne EOI 13110 and provided > a comparison for your consideration > http://www.oic.org/z/XZIG/UNCEFACT/ > > As the Mission Statement of UN/CEFACT sates that it "supports > activities dedicated to improving ebusiness activities" this review by > you may be of considerable importance to UN/CEFACT hence > the copy to Duane NICKULL. > > UN/CEFACT may want to support this initiative as: > > 1 Standards Australia has not been able to reconvene IS/11, > > 2 Tradegate has shut down ebXML Australia and > > 3 The Federal Government "retired" the Australian Panel > of eCommerce > Experts > http://www.ecommerce.treasury.gov.au/html/expert.htm > > NEXT STEPS > > B FRI 15 DEC - BY 17:00 > > 1 review new format again as draft AS 4590 address segment > > 2 If still agree Complex version can replace simplex version > > Please send e-mail > > 3 "I have reviewed proposed AS 4590 single XML Address > and still consider it as the best option as an eCommerce > Standard" > > Thank you > > Regards > > Stephen GOULD > Chair > XLM & eCommerce Special Interest Group > OPEN INTERCHANGE CONSORTIUM > > E: sggould@oic.org > M: 0416-009-468 > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: ubl-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org > For additional commands, e-mail: ubl-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]