[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: SV: [ubl-dev] Modeling multiple possible invoice totals based onpayment means
I have perfected this model, I don't send you an invoice and I don't tell you how much you owe me, just send me money until I tell you to stop. Step 1: nothing Step 2: nothing Step 3: Profit!! Cheers, Bryan Rasmussen -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: david.lyon@preisshare.net [mailto:david.lyon@preisshare.net] Sendt: 9. januar 2007 03:14 Til: ubl-dev@lists.oasis-open.org Emne: RE: [ubl-dev] Modeling multiple possible invoice totals based onpayment means Quoting Fulton Wilcox <fulton.wilcox@coltsnecksolutions.com>: > With respect to "Evaluated Receipts" see the description below extracted > from an Australian governmental site. > http://www.agimo.gov.au/publications/2002/11/dbowg/trade > > "Invoiceless trading > > Several Commonwealth Government agencies are using 'invoiceless trading' Yes I can vouch for this. They pluck a number from (somewhere), don't send you an invoice, and send you instantly into debt. Saying you have to pay or else. It has nothing to do with best practice. It's not good practice to not send somebody and an invoice. But they couldn't care less. Must happen overseas also.... I like the BBC-Little-Britain skit that goes along the lines of "Computer says no". but in this case, it's more like, "Beaurocrats type whatever they like (now they have an xml - whoopee) and if you don't like it - waste your time and money trying to defend it in court" Gimme a break - invoiceless trading.... they've scammed me for thousands with that line... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: ubl-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: ubl-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]