[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: SV: [ubl-dev] Hybrid approach to local vs. global
Hi Ken Surely this would have very limited use - only seems to work when both sides of the mapping use the same NDR. Wouldn't it be more efficient to make it possible to map between two NDRs. There the scope is improved if both sides of the mapping conform to CCTS and use the same Core Components. As CCTS/Core Components is an ISO standard now, wouldn't it be better to make that the bedrock for the Document Schema Renaming Language (DSRL) and then the XSLT would presumably have greater usefulness, though admitedly it might be to complex to do with XSLT when you don't know the two schema designs. Maybe if ATG2 decide to go for the hybrid approach with an XSLT transformation (see my prototype back in the UBL archives somewhere) then the XSLT could form part of either DSRL or its successor if the scope is increased to include mappings between NDRs (schema designs) and perhaps with underlying Core Component interoperability. Looks then like all singing from same (ISO) singsheet. Plus, in there somewhere could it be that both sides don't have to be ATG2 or UBL and thus my STU might even be allowed ('Simpler Than UBL' design for UBL model), and maybe binary XML too. All the best Stephen Green >>> "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com> 02/03/07 13:17:39 >>> At 2007-03-02 12:54 +0100, Bryan Rasmussen wrote: > >>For example - if the Russian Government said - "we'd love to use UBL - > >>but we need different tagnames for in country use" - then having the > >>option to use CAM to morph between localization details and say an EU > >>base-line - would obviously be enabling... and overall I'm guessing the > >>bigger goal is UBL adoption and use, rather than say driving XSD > >>adoption and use!?! > > >This isn't a new idea and my comments regarding not supporting this > >have nothing to do with CAM. ISO/IEC 19757-8 Document Schema > >Renaming Language (DSRL) was also posited to address the use case of > >a community of UBL users wanting to have "local" names for a > >transliterated (not transformed) document vocabulary equivalent in > >structure to UBL. This has already been discussed. > >Is this part of the DSDL? Yes, it is: http://dsdl.org Here is the FCD ballot document: http://www.jtc1sc34.org/repository/0792c.htm . . . . . . . . Ken -- World-wide corporate, govt. & user group XML, XSL and UBL training RSS feeds: publicly-available developer resources and training G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/u/ Box 266, Kars, Ontario CANADA K0A-2E0 +1(613)489-0999 (F:-0995) Male Cancer Awareness Aug'05 http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/u/bc Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: ubl-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: ubl-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org ______________________________________________________________________ Please note the new simpler name for our website: http://www.bristol.gov.uk Our email addresses have also changed - visit http://www.bristol.gov.uk/bigchange for further details. Sign-up for our email bulletin giving news, have-your-say and event information at: http://www.bristol.gov.uk/newsdirect ______________________________________________________________________ Please note the new simpler name for our website: http://www.bristol.gov.uk Our email addresses have also changed - visit http://www.bristol.gov.uk/bigchange for further details. Sign-up for our email bulletin giving news, have-your-say and event information at: http://www.bristol.gov.uk/newsdirect
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]