[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl-dev] A Subset for UBL 2.1 (like UBL Small Business Subset)
Sorry, by 'Conformance TC' I meant 'Conformance SC' of course.
----Stephen D Green
On 26 July 2011 06:58, Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks TimI think another way to do it would be to form a Conformance TCand make an SBS just one kind of 'conformance profile'[1] theycould consider for UBL. Then the SBS culd just be the basis ofone of potentially several UBL 'conformance profiles', perhapsfeeding into test beds, etc.[1] - I guess by 'conformance profile' I mean a fairly lightweightspec as external to the UBL spec (perhaps like the ebXMLprofiles which are published from time to time) where the heavylifting is done in comprehensive conformance clauses (perhapsmore complex than the blanket UBL clause - perhaps a clausefor senders, another for receivers and another for the document).----Stephen D Green
On 26 July 2011 02:09, Tim McGrath <tim.mcgrath@documentengineeringservices.com> wrote:
your timing is incredible. i have also been considering the fact that we now have several years implementation experience and it would be worthwhile to revisit this concept. others have also suggested ideas for this and it seems we may be able to provide something alongside the 2.1 release.
do you think we should revive the SBS TC for this?
On 26/07/11 3:51 AM, Stephen D Green wrote:--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: ubl-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: ubl-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.orgJust as public review is due to start for UBL, I'vespent a few hours revisiting the subset work I didstarting with the UBL Small Business Subset andupdating it for UBL 2.1. (Maybe it can be developedinto a 2.1 SBS.)I have put the attached together as a possible 2.1subset similar to the UBL Small Business Subsetbut supporting the digital signatures in UBL 2.1.I hope the mail servers let me to do this. Apologiesif they do not.Maybe folk will find it useful, although it is not acomprehensive, thorough work like the BII and OIOsubsets. It represents my own understanding of whatI think is a compromise between minimalism andpracticality but I cannot claim a live implementation.Is there still any scope for making the external subsetproject outputs more integral to future UBL versions?----Stephen D Green
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ubl-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ubl-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]