[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl-dev] Re: Question about the receipt advice
Personally, having been responsible for some of the receipt advice model design, I believe the main emphasis of the model was placed on goods and not services. Subsequent work to look at services might have focused more on the invoice and might have missed the receipt advice. Although my own employment has changed so that I cannot be involved further with UBL document engineering in UBL TC, I would guess that it would be a concern for UBL that any new focus on services be introduced across the breadth of all business documents defined using UBL, but that said, it seems to me that at good look at the use cases for UBL in a service provision context across all documents would be a sensible next step. Albeit a pity that I cannot contribute my own time. Best regards Stephen D Green On 24 January 2014 08:56, Tim McGrath <tim.mcgrath@documentengineeringservices.com> wrote: > I will pass this to the ubl-dev mailing list as they tend to give better > answers than me! You will not get a response from the ubl-comment list - > that is for public reviews. > > > ubl-dev is an unmoderated, public mail list that provides an open forum for > developers to exchange ideas and information on implementing the UBL OASIS > Standard. You can subscribe to ubl-dev using the OASIS list manager at > > http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/ > and view the ubl-list archives at > > http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl-dev/ > > > On 21/01/2014, at 11:03 PM, <Cecile.GUASCH@ext.ec.europa.eu> > <Cecile.GUASCH@ext.ec.europa.eu> wrote: > > Dear Tim > I am sorry to disturb you but I do not know to whom to ask this type of > questions, > Kind regards, > Cécile GUASCH (met in CEN BII pre award meeting, Brussels) > > _____________________________________________ > From: GUASCH Cecile (DIGIT-EXT) > Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 3:59 PM > To: 'ubl-comment@lists.oasis-open.org' > Cc: STANCIULESCU Cristina (DIGIT); OLLINGER Yannick (DIGIT-EXT) > Subject: Question about the receipt advice > > > Dears, > In the European Commission we have been making use of the receipt advice > class to exchange the acceptation of delivered goods. > We are now in the process of implementing the same mechanism for delivered > services. > Nevertheless we encounter some variability namely : > > exchanging the quality of the delivered service > exchanging the penalty that will be applied for the given delivery. > > > We could not find a proper element in the current 2.0 ReceiptAdvice schema. > Is it a mistake from our part, are there existing plans to take on board > these requirements, could you accept these requirements in a future version > of the receipt advice? > > Thanks in advance, > Cécile GUASCH > > > > ----------------- > Regards > Tim McGrath > tim.mcgrath@documentengineeringservices.com > Fremantle, Western Australia > http://www.documentengineeringservices.com > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]