[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Rule: 82
I would change the rule text: >[R 82] UBL documents must conform to all the requirements of the most >current XML Recommendation. Why are we worried just about these characters. I don't know that this is even required, but if you want to keep something for this rule, then I would make the more general and inclusive rule as above. Otherwise its like, "Oh all I need are these characters I can forget about all the other XML requirements". At 10:17 AM 7/14/2003 -0500, Lisa-Aeon wrote: >Rules for Voting: Each email will have only one rule in it, I will try to >mark the rules that group with it, or rules that might duplicate it. The >membership has 5 working days to bring forth objection or discussion, after >the 5 working days, if there are no objections, the rule will be assumed to >be "ACCEPTED" and be given to the LCSC for their implementation. > >Please Reply leaving first email in Reply. > >Voting period on this rule ends: July 18, 2003 > >******************************* >[R 82] UBL documents must use the same legal characters in XML character >data that are listed in the XML Recommendation. Including tab, carriage >return, line feed, and the legal characters of Unicode and ISO/IEC 10646. > > >ATG Decision: rule has not yet been discussed by ATG2 > > > >--- > >File has not been scanned > >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). >Version: 6.0.498 / Virus Database: 297 - Release Date: 7/8/2003
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]