[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl] Re: AW: UBL schema tests
Marty Burns and I are reviewing the draft 7.1 codelist right now also. We are alittle confused, we are using Marks Visio drawing from the face to face and there seems to be missing pieces of the codelist stuff. Is there supposed to be a Codelist Schema Modules? not just Unqualified Codelist module. Where will it reside, and what will be in it? Also, in the Common Basic Components, and in the CCT there are types that have attributes that are code list values, but they are not inheriting from codelists. For example - Amount.Type. We need some answers on how this is all supposed to work......neither Marty or I were in the meeting where this was discussed at the F2F. We are trying to see how the CCT and CCP are working within the Codelist modules, and we are not seeing it. For example: Codetype contains a listID that is not the CCP listID. Not having these answers is slowing down the review of this work. Can someone please get back to us. Lisa and Marty. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim McGrath" <tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au> To: "David Kruppke" <kruppke@gefeg.com> Cc: <ubl@lists.oasis-open.org> Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 7:06 PM Subject: [ubl] Re: AW: UBL schema tests > we obviously need to become more co-ordinated in this work. > > the code list mechanism used here is not what i expected to see. for > example, in Order we use the Data Type "ISO4217 Alpha_ Code. Type" for > the BBIE called "Order. Transaction Currency. Code". you have also > taken "ISO4217 Alpha" as a Qualifier for the Representation Term and > thereby changed the Dictionary Entry Name - we don't want to do this. > > also, why do we still have a 'DerivedCodeType'? Shouldn't the > SpecialisedDataType just refer to the namespace for the precise code > list. Is this just a legacy of the old code list mechanism (and hence > an unnecessary level of referencing) or does it add some value? > > finally, the structures you build in the Specialised Data Types still > use the old/incorrect attributes and xsd:datatypes. these should now be > taken from those in the models. > > to help synchronise ourselves - i have uploaded the latest complete > models to the UBL LC web page and just so we can make sure we are > talking about the same things, i am renaming these models 'draft 7' so > we can forget the versions and sub versions below this. the link is... > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl/ubl-lcsc/download.php/5786/UBL-1.0-draft7-models.zip > > > > David Kruppke wrote: > > >Hello all, > > > >please find enclosed the file "draft-6.1.zip". It includes the "draft-6.1" > >schema modules. > > > >These files are based on Tims models. > > > >The codelists "ChannelCode" and "CurrencyCode" contain already codes, the > >appropriate specialized datatypes as well. > > > > > >Regards > > > > > >David > > > > > > -- > regards > tim mcgrath > phone: +618 93352228 > postal: po box 1289 fremantle western australia 6160 > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl/members/leave_workgroup.php. > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]