[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl] Question regarding final NDR
At 05:20 PM 3/9/2004 -0500, you wrote: >Acronyms such as ccts:BCC, ccts:ACC, ccts:ABIE currently are not >used. This was done to ensure clarity each time these terms occur. My >question is this - is the general consensus that I should preserve clarity >through the absence of the use of acronyms, or should I shorten the >document by the liberal use of acronyms? > >Mark As a somewhat casual participant and novice user. I would vote for less acronyms. Some of these are so close BCC and ACC that they just run together in my mind. The words have a little more meaning. To me the acronyms area a barrier to use and make this an "insiders" tool. Question, why the introduction of a namespace on the acronyms - are you proposing that this should be used as well? ..dan
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]