[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl] UBL schema tests draft-8.2
David Just a couple of things I noticed: 1. some of the definitions (e.g. in the codelist schemas) are truncated - are these just too long (we've had that problem before) 2. where schemas A imports schema B which then imports schema C should schema A have declarations for schema C (just declared, with no schemalocation) - XML Spy seems to have a few minor difficulties in automatically generated instances when you don't have the above declarations (which we don't as yet) - which makes me question whether it is an error to leave out such a declaration Of course, including such an declaration of an indirect import could cause us problems if we don't include all the codelist schemas as separate schema modules and then try to add them later so I'm hoping we are correct in leaving out these declarations All the best, Steve David Kruppke <dill2@gefeg.com> wrote on 15.03.2004, 12:25:51: > Hello all, > > this is version draft-8.2. > > It improves version 8.1 through containing the codes Anne sent to the ubl > list, but there are not any annotation-documentation for the code values. > > I need a decision how the documentation for codes should look like. > > > Thanks in advance > > > David
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]