[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl] Wednesday call schedule
[mavis.cournane@cognitran.com:] | in terms of the CLSC slot I suggest that we keep it. The time will | be spend updating the CLSC document with respect to the outcomes | of the Coordination call on Tues, and we will also need to look | closely at what precisely needs to be addressed for 1.1. Marty has | done some sterling work and we are very anxious to follow through | and ensure we do not drop any balls. Agreed. I think that the ideal would be for CLSC document to be worded in a way that preserves the work invested in the substitution group mechanism but positions it as an option under active consideration for UBL 1.1 and available now for groups that wish to use it. Clearly some groups want this feature and some don't, so the spec should be written in a way that allows this choice to be exercised while preserving uniformity of the metadata. Jon
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]