[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ubl] Meeting Minutes UBL Joint meeting Mar 23rd 2004
> 9) We only need cbcs for each "BBIE property" (PropertyTerm+Rep.Term) - > not a cbc for each qualified BBIEs. although i am then not sure how > we can name any qualified BBIEs. > AI - Mike G -research and give example(s) for discussion Wed. It was requested that I use the following items from the CBC schema as an example: <xsd:element name="StreetName" type="udt:NameType"/> <xsd:element name="AdditionalStreetName" type="udt:NameType"/> Reference: wd-ublndrsc-ndrdoc-V1pt0Draftp.doc [Line 1848]: BBIE properties are represented with complex types. Rule [CTD5][Line 1858] Every ccts:BBIEProperty xsd:complexType content model xsd:base attribute value MUST be the ccts:CCT of the unspecialised or specialised UBL datatype as appropriate. Example: What would be expected in the CBC schema would be a type 'StreetNameType' with base="udt:NameType". Then we would have: <xsd:element name="StreetName" type="StreetNameType"/> In the CAC Schema (or wherever), where you need 'AdditionalStreetName', it would be declared as: <xsd:element name="AdditionalStreetName" type="cbc:StreetNameType"/>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]