[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Index review - content
Typo:
Appendix A.4 "...commercial UBL
tools A list of tools ..." missing full-stop
In appendix B.1 "..models following the UBL Naming and Design Rules
described in Section B.4 according to.." - this may need to be
reworded, depending on what NDR document is included.
Typo:
Appendix B.2 "..The document domponent model is
the result .."
Appendix B.2 "The components in these models do not have any specific navigation
described. This is defined as part of the structural assemblies required for
each document type." I agree the wording here is unclear. Tim
has already reworded
this, "The associations in these model do not have any specific direction
defined. They can be navigated in either direction. It is when we assembly documents that we define the navigation path for each association." But how about: "The models at this conceptual stage have
associations without directional arrows. The associations are given
direction in the next stage when documents are assembled."
Typo:
Appendix B.3, paragraph 2 "Document
asssembly.."
Perhaps this second paragraph in Appendix B.3 could
be worded more clearly, e.g. a replacement for the word "traversing" in "All the other Aggregate BIEs (object classes) for
the document type are derived by traversing the associations from this Aggregate
BIE to..." or perhaps replacing "derived" with "identified".
B.3.3 Reusable
BIEs spreadsheet: Description needed here? (though none is
given for each of the document spreadsheets, so perhaps not)
e.g. something like
"This model
provides the Aggregate Business Information Entities (ABIEs) that are used
throughout UBL, serving, in effect, as an “ABIE type database” for constructing
the main documents. This model may be modified in customization." ( - derived
from the CAC Schema description).
B.3.3 Specialised Datatypes
Spreadsheet: Perhaps add "...This model may be modified in customization."
or the like at the end of the description.
D.2 first paragraph
"be specified, as must the
“fittings” (handles, stays
etc.)"
D.2 penultimate
paragraph "In order to
encourage speedy payment of the amount due, the Seller offers a discount for
prompt settlement, which the buyer can deduct if paying within 30 days.
(Note that VAT regulations assume it will be taken, so the tax
is calculated on the trade discounted total of line items plus any charges and
less the settlement discount amount.)"
- Not sure if this is currently accurate. Also, UK VAT now frowns, I
think, on "mixed implementations", i.e. on "... a paper copy is signed and
returned as proof of receipt. Hence the UBL Receipt Advice is not used."
I'm just a little worried about how accurately all this represents
current UK VAT regulations (recently revised with the
recent provision of EU VAT directives). Need a bit of time to look at this.
Can we water it down a bit?
Steve
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]