[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl] Re: what to do about namespaces in schemas
On 07/19/2004 01:19 PM, MCRAWFORD@lmi.org wrote: > The committee drafts are just that- drafts. Specification is reserved > for those that complete the oasis process. If we are talking about *the* document that will be presented for OASIS membership approval as an OASIS Standard, then it has to follow the naming rules contained in RFC 3121 (http://www.rfc-archive.org/getrfc.php?rfc=3121) I thought we were talking about *the* document. I've also just gone and re-read the RFC, which I should have done to begin with... The URN should be: urn:oasis:names:specification:<specification-id>:schema:xsd:1.0 Note that <specification-id> should be provided by OASIS. I certainly believe that "ubl" is appropriate, but we should make sure that Karl Best is aware of this and approves of it as specification-id; I may be rehashing things... Note that OASIS (Karl) should assign type and subtype, but I believe using schema:xsd should not be a problem. Note that it should say "1.0", not "1:0", I believe (although the RFC could be read as saying that <document-id> [which is what this would be] should be provided by OASIS too.) Sorry if this introduces even more confusion. If we are not talking about *the* document then the urgency of getting it right decreases, even though it would indeed be nice getting it right. > Mark R. Crawford > Senior Research Fellow - LMI XML Lead > W3C Advisory Committee, OASIS, RosettaNet Representative > Vice Chair - OASIS UBL TC & Chair Naming and Design Rules Subcommittee > Chair - UN/CEFACT XML Syntax Working Group > Editor - UN/CEFACT Core Components > -- > LMI Government Consulting > 2000 Corporate Ridge > McLean, VA 22102-7805 > 703.917.7177 Phone > 703.655.4810 Wireless > The opportunity to make a difference has never been greater > www.lmi.org > > -----Original Message----- > From: Stephen Green <stephen_green@seventhproject.co.uk> > To: ubl@lists.oasis-open.org <ubl@lists.oasis-open.org> > Sent: Mon Jul 19 16:04:09 2004 > Subject: [ubl] Re: what to do about namespaces in schemas > > Eduardo > > Thanks for these comments. I thought, looking at the rule, that it should be > changed to xmlns="urn:oasis:names:specification:ubl:Order:1:0" > or is that what it should be prior to standards approval? > > Also, should we be going back to prefixing with draft numbers until we are > sure > we have a bug-free set of Schemas? > > Steve > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Eduardo Gutentag" <Eduardo.Gutentag@Sun.COM> > To: "Grimley Michael J NPRI" <GrimleyMJ@Npt.NUWC.Navy.Mil> > Cc: <Anne.Hendry@Sun.COM>; <mcrawford@lmi.org>; <Jon.Bosak@Sun.COM>; > <stephen_green@seventhproject.co.uk> > Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 7:50 PM > Subject: Re: what to do about namespaces in schemas > > > > Right, > > > > changing > > > > xmlns="urn:oasis:names:tc:ubl:Order:1:0" > > to > > xmlns="urn:oasis:names:ubl:Order:1:0" > > > > (and others accordingly) should be enough. Unless what is being > changed is > > the TC spec previous to Standards approval. If that is the case then we > would > > have to re-think this answer... > > > > On 07/16/2004 06:27 AM, Grimley Michael J NPRI wrote: > > > Anne, > > > > > > To answer Question 1, see Rule NMS5: > > > > > > [NMS5] The namespace names for UBL Schemas holding OASIS Standard > status MUST be of the form: > > > > > > > urn:oasis:names:specification:ubl:schema:<name>:<major>:<minor> > > > > > > This pretty much answers Question 2 as well, because it is version 1.0 > of the OASIS spec. (The other was 1.0 of the TC draft.) > > > > > > Thank You, > > > MikeG > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Anne Hendry [mailto:anne.hendry@sun.com] > > > Sent: Thursday, 15 July 2004 21 24 > > > To: mcrawford@lmi.org; Eduardo.Gutentag; GrimleyMJ@Npt.NUWC.Navy.Mil; > jon.bosak@sun.com > > > Cc: stephen_green@seventhproject.co.uk > > > Subject: what to do about namespaces in schemas > > > > > > Since we are changing the schemas we are wondering how to handle the > updating of the namespace in a couple of ways. Where we have, for example, > > > > > > xmlns="urn:oasis:names:tc:ubl:Order:1:0" > > > xmlns:ccts="urn:oasis:names:tc:ubl:CoreComponentParameters:1:0" > > > xmlns:cbc="urn:oasis:names:tc:ubl:CommonBasicComponents:1:0" > > > xmlns:cac="urn:oasis:names:tc:ubl:CommonAggregateComponents:1:0" > > > > > > > xmlns:res="urn:oasis:names:tc:ubl:codelist:AcknowledgementResponseCode:1:0" > > > xmlns:udt="urn:oasis:names:tc:ubl:UnspecializedDatatypes:1:0" > > > xmlns:sdt="urn:oasis:names:tc:ubl:SpecializedDatatypes:1:0" > > > xmlns:cur="urn:oasis:names:tc:ubl:codelist:CurrencyCode:1:0" > > > > > > 1. Do we need to change the 'tc' part now that it's becoming an OASIS > spec, 2. Do we also need to change the 1:0 part since we these schemas will > be different than the earlier 1:0 schemas we released? We could have it as > 1.0-draft-1, or 1.0.1 or something like that. Or are we intending that > everyone that receives this final release will replace any previous one > marked '1.0'. This could cause a lot of confusiion, though, as I'm not sure > how one would identify the 'correct' 1.0 schemas once they were installed > and/or circulated. > > > > > > This needs to be thought out now because we're changing the ccp schema > now and this may well never be changed again without any other reason. > > > > > > Stephen/Anne > > > > > > > -- > > Eduardo Gutentag | e-mail: eduardo.gutentag@Sun.COM > > Web Technologies and Standards | Phone: +1 510 550 4616 x31442 > > Sun Microsystems Inc. | W3C AC Rep / OASIS BoD > > > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of > the OASIS TC), go to > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl/members/leave_workgroup.php. > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of > the OASIS TC), go to > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl/members/leave_workgroup.php. > -- Eduardo Gutentag | e-mail: eduardo.gutentag@Sun.COM Web Technologies and Standards | Phone: +1 510 550 4616 x31442 Sun Microsystems Inc. | W3C AC Rep / OASIS BoD
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]