[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: Review and comments of OASIS Universal Business Language (UBL) V1.0
Hello Gunther, The UBL TC is processing the last of the comments received on the UBL 1.0 Committee Draft before submitting a revised version to OASIS. We agreed earlier to consider your comments of 18 June even though they came in after the close of the review period, but in attempting to resolve these issues in today's Atlantic TC call, we found that we were lacking enough detail to address them satisfactorily. We suspect that most of your comments have to do with differences between UBL 1.0 CD and an old version of the NDR document and that they are therefore no longer relevant, as noted in a message sent to you from Tim McGrath 23 June 2004 and archived at http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200406/msg00090.html However, in the absence of any response from you to the message from Tim, we cannot be certain that these issues are no longer applicable without knowing further details. In order to consider your comments effectively, therefore, the TC has asked me to request that you review the issues you have raised in light of the NDR checklist used in UBL 1.0 CD (rather than an older version of the NDR document) and to resubmit those issues together with specific examples that will enable us to understand them in enough detail to resolve them. Tim included a copy of the 1.0 CD checklist in the message referenced above. Since we are just a few days away from resolution of the remaining issues and are striving to complete the CD revision before leaving for our meeting in Copenhagen, the TC has asked me to request your clarification of the issues via posting to the UBL TC mail list no later than this Friday, 23 July. This will allow us to review your issues in email in time to finish resolution of 1.0 CD issues in our Atlantic and Pacific TC meetings 28 and 29 July. Some other members of the TC will be attempting in the meantime to review your issues against the 1.0 checklist as well, but we all consider your input very valuable and want to have the benefit of clarifications to your earlier comments if it is possible to receive them in time for consideration during this review cycle. Best regards, Jon
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]