[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Minutes Atlantic UBL Call
Dear all below are the minutes of today's Atlantic Call. Regards Mavis --------- 1. Welcome and roll-call by Mavis the Moderator. Mavis Cournane Tony Coates Marty Burns Jessica Glace Sylvia Webb Anne Hendry David Kunkel Michael Dill Paul Thorpe 2. STANDING ITEMS Additions to the calendar (http://ibiblio.org/bosak/ubl/calendar.htm) Liaison reports (if any)World custThere is a commitment to have a proper data model andto be core component aligned. Subcommittee reports (if any) MB: @ things. Trying to gain common basis for incorporating To new work, second, try to capture the unqie requirements that drive his approach and merge them in to existing requirements. TC has provided a revised paper outlining these requirements, and other requirements he thinks are valuable. Marty next step is to match those up to those we already have, there is probably a substantial overlap. Get the requirements in to a form where people recognize their thoughts on. Some of the requirements are pitched at a level above UBL that would work across format. Different standards could yse them as a way of sharing the same code lists. The principle separating the data model from the schema representing the data model. The idea is to find what new additional requirements and refinements can be made to the data model, AH: Does that differ from how we do UBL now. TC: A bit. Now there is no generic format in which the code lists are specified. AH: We hope to derive those. we don't have a specific format for the data model right now. MB: It is very similar. In the last version of the code list doc as part of UBL 1.0 there were a number of things on which we did not reach consensus, ie. how to map the data model. We are looking for people to send us specific concerns and issues. I want to go through this exercise. Issues to date are not very specific. He will be working with Mark Crawford to understand the specific NDR concerns. 3. SSC issues UBL-CoreComponentTypes Issues What would happen if we reused ATGs CCT schema and the UDT schema. Decision: We need a team to investigate this and this will help us make a decision on this. UBL-UnspecializedDatatypes Issues Item 4: We will defer deliberations on item 4 until we make a decision about the future of UBLs UDT and CCT schema modules. Item 5: This issue has been resolved by EF by porting what Tim has done in the spreadsheet. Mark's comment is not clear. We need further clarification. UBL-SpecializedDatatypes Item 4: We don't really feel that given the small user community that changing this for 1.0.1 would be much of an issue. EDIFIX are implementing the truncation of spaces for attribute values. 1.0.1 should not be a spreadsheet alignment issue. It is really a clarification of 1.0. They should not be tied to the use of EDIFIX by the TC to generate 1.1 artifacts. Item 5: We do not feel these should be attributes in the schema. In terms of the credit, this is an item Jon can help us with. 4. Meeting Conflicts: 01/31 - 02/04 - Sylvia Webb is out but did not see that as problematic. 02/07-02/11 MarkC, Sylvia Webb out 02/14-02/18 MavisC out 02/21-02/25 MavisC out 02/28-03/04 W3C plenary 03/07-03/11 TC154; TBG17, London 03/14-03/18 UN/CEFACT, Kuala Lumpur 03/21-03/25 JB out [easter is 27 March] 03/28-04/01 AH out Our recommendation for the moment would be 31 Jan - Feb 4th if the main focus is not EDIFIX design related
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]