[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl-ssc] Minutes of SSC Call 17th March 2005
Amendment: I think, for extension, the redeclared InvoiceLineType would need an extra intermediate name since it would otherwise appear twice in the same namespace. This might then need a new Naming and Design Rule for the intermediate complexType name. [original message is at http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl-ssc/200503/msg00013.html ] >>> "Stephen Green" <stephen_green@bristol-city.gov.uk> 03/18/05 13:05 PM >>> ... possibly here a redeclaration of the 1.0 elements and global complexTypes under the 1.1 namespace ... <xsd:element name="InvoiceLine" type="InvoiceLineType"/> ... redeclaration of the InvoiceLineType ... <!-- extension of InvoiceLineType --> <xsd:complexType name="InvoiceLineType"> <xsd:complexContent> <xsd:extension base="InvoiceLineType"> <xsd:sequence> <xsd:element ref="cbc:InspectionDate" minOccurs="0"/> </xsd:sequence> </xsd:extension> </xsd:complexContent> </xsd:complexType> ... further redeclarations of the 1.0 elements and global complexTypes under the 1.1 namespace ...
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]