[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: ATG2 CCTS Schemas with UBL
Folks
Just to mention I've tried the ATG2 CCTS schema
with UBL 1.0 (see attached) and found
hardly any problems
all I had to change in UBL (so it seems so
far)
were some complexContent to
simpleContent
(since some ATG2 UDTs are simple where they are
complexTypes in UBL 1.0)
I've not tried this on instances yet.
All the best
Steve
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]