[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Minutes of Pacific UBL TC call 02|03 May 2005
MINUTES OF PACIFIC UBL TC MEETING 00H30 - 02H30 UTC TUESDAY 3 MAY 2005 ATTENDANCE Jon Bosak (chair) Micah Dubinko Stephen Green Tim McGrath Sylvia Webb ADMINISTRIVIA Meeting in Hangzhou ACTION: JonB to send slides for opening overview. New TC process New membership categories were noted. STANDING ITEMS Additions to the calendar (http://ibiblio.org/bosak/ubl/calendar.htm) None. Liaison report: Tax XML TC SylviaW: Had no access to the Internet last week and was not able to participate. Have seen nothing from them except draft response comments to Tim's comments. The next meeting is not till the end of the month. ACTION: SylviaW to check on what's happening by phone and let us know by email. Subcommittee report: SBSC StephenG: Waiting for KenH to come back to update the URIs... and a few other things dependent on Ken. Has the copyright changed due to revised policy? JonB: Don't think so. Subcommittee report: SSC StephenG: SC hasn't met and probably won't till after the Hangzhou plenary. Finished further prototype to demonstrate that we can adopt the polymorphic design for minor revisions and also include the ATG2 CCTS schemas; no showstoppers there, everything works OK. Subcommittee report: HISC MicahD: Have put out a call to a large number of implementors, and they are starting to respond. Done everything necessary at this point. Team report: IDA/OGC TimM: IDA/OGC held a F2F last week to conclude the gap analysis, buthaven't heard anything since -- no minutes or notes from that discussion. The goal was to conclude their analysis and produce a single spreadsheet, like Tax XML, to submit to UBL. We have a call scheduled for this Friday. We had a lengthy discussion in last week's IDA/OGC call about taxation; even if Tax XML is late, there will be so much overlap that we can be pretty sure to incorporate it; there is a lot of similarity in the two sets of requirements. Team report: COML TimM: Held a couple of meetings in the last week. CrimsonLogic have generated draft schemas from their submission and are now making a few additions to cardinalities and a couple of components. There will be another round of edits to be done by CL, and then they will be finished. Chee-Kai has been helping them understand spreadsheets and generated schemas. STATUS REVIEW JonB: Agenda: "We need to start working out a more detailed timeline. I'm especially interested to know how we're going to handle the proposed Catalogue document." Who does the actual document spreadsheets? TimM: In the case of COML, it uses a significant part of the UBL 1.0 library, but has a different business context and therefore has a lot of original material. So they ended up with a new UBL document model spreadsheet and a set of extensions to the UBL Reusable spreadsheet. To make a deliverable, the UBL TC has to go through the additions and decide whether they are acceptable. In this case, no real design effort is required of the TC, just an approval process. We had hoped we could have gotten to that level with IDA/OGC, but don't think we will, and that's probably not a bad thing. For the requested new document types, the UBL TC will need to do design rather than just approval. JonB: We will need one person to take on the job of the initial model for each new doctype. TimM: We should start with sourcing and then move through the extended process. JonB: "Catalogue" is a monster! TimM: Wrong name. This is not really a catalogue, just a piece of info that goes from seller to buyer that says "if you want to order this product, use this ID number and price"... it's the response to a query, "how much are red widgets" and should have been named something like "product information message." "Catalogue" is an OGC term, not IDA. JonB: We're now in the Content Team part of this meeting. TimM: This is what we will be discussing next week in Hangzhou: looking at the sourcing process, whether the proposed docs are what we want, and what to call them. StephenG: What about the UBL 2.0 schedule? JonB: Nominally the same as it was a week ago. ACTION: TC, meeting in Hangzhou, to come up with a more detailed time line for review in the Pacific TC call 16|17 May. Jon Bosak Chair, OASIS UBL TC
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]