[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl] Discussion of RELAX-NG/W3C Schema normativeness in SBSC work
At 2005-05-17 18:21 -0400, MCRAWFORD@lmi.org wrote: > >At the present time, the RELAX-NG expression is normative and the W3C > Schema is informative > >This is a major violation of the NDR. But these are not document models for UBL transaction documents, these are document models for behind-the-curtain processes. W3C Schema isn't powerful enough to express what we would like to express. >The only normative expressions for UBL ar XSD. Any deviation will result >in non adoption by heavy hitters who have mandated the use of XSD. What is the breadth of scope of the NDR? I understood them to be only for the models of the instances used for transactions. The work we are doing is not expressing constraints on a UBL transaction document, but on support files. Should we be handcuffed by W3C Schema everywhere? . . . . . . . Ken -- World-wide on-site corporate, govt. & user group XML/XSL training. G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/ Box 266, Kars, Ontario CANADA K0A-2E0 +1(613)489-0999 (F:-0995) Male Breast Cancer Awareness http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/bc Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]