[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl] ACC? AW: [ubl] PLENARY REPORT FROM THE UBL TC MEETING IN HANGZHOU 9 MAY - 13 MAY 2005
Greetings Mark, Unfortunately in this situation where we need another namespace, the NDR prevents use of an internal schema module: "[SSM6] All UBL internal schema modules MUST be in the same namespace as their corresponding document schema." Best Regards Steve ----- Original Message ----- From: <MCRAWFORD@lmi.org> To: <ubl@lists.oasis-open.org> Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 12:45 PM Subject: RE: [ubl] ACC? AW: [ubl] PLENARY REPORT FROM THE UBL TC MEETING IN HANGZHOU 9 MAY - 13 MAY 2005 > Just noting that the original issue seems not to be whether a > document has BBIEs just below the top level but whether these > BBIEs belong to the document namespace or to the common or > core namespaces (common basic components). > In other words if they belonged to the > document namespace then they would be > "not in the Common Basic Components". > This is the UBL 1.0 problem I think is to be addressed. It seems to me this is exactly why we created the internal schema modules - ABIEs and BBIEs that were unique could be declared in the document namespace since the internal schema module resides in that space. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]