[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Minutes of Pacific UBL TC call 5|6 September 2005
MINUTES OF PACIFIC UBL TC MEETING 00H30 - 02H30 UTC TUESDAY 6 SEPTEMBER 2005 ATTENDANCE Jon Bosak (chair) Stephen Green Betty Harvey Ken Holman Tim McGrath Sylvia Webb STANDING ITEMS Additions to the calendar: http://ibiblio.org/bosak/ubl/calendar.htm There will be a PSC f2f 20 September in Brussels. Liaison reports JB: Anything from APEC meeting? TM: No news. Liaison report: Tax XML TC SW: Next meeting is at the end of the month. TM: They did come back to us on the definition of tax category. We need to add item tax category to the model, but not sure where. ACTION: TM to respond to the Tax XML TC regarding their input on tax category. SG: Are the newly added elements now still needed? TM: We need to revise the model and then check back with the Tax XML TC. AGREED to keep the new elements that have been added to satisfy what we thought were the tax requirements and resolve further Tax XML TC input on these as part of phase 1 public review. AGREED that Tax XML issues should be added to the PSC issues list. Subcommittee report: SBSC (SBS 1.0) JB: Status of changes for 1.0 SBS for Altova? GKH: SG has convinced me that dummy values in 1.0 "empty" instances would be obvious. OK with doing this. ACTION: SG to produce new SBS 1.0 "empty" sample instances for GKH; GKH to produce XPaths by next week. Subcommittee report: SBSC (SBS 2.0) SG: Started to look at what Quote and Request for Quote look like, but need to wait for EF schemas in order to produce the 2.0 subset. GKH: HISC also on hold for 2.0 till we get schemas. SW: Challenge 1: The spreadsheets do not include ATG2 UDTs. SG: They do, but not the same... [didn't capture all of this] SW: Challenge 2: It's possible that PB's reordering of BIEs may cause problems with current EF programming; must test this further tonight. ACTION: SW to continue testing and post results to PSC. Can use this week's SSC meeting slot for work on this if necessary. Subcommittee report: PSC SW: Held weekly meeting this morning. Reviewed comments on the initial spreadsheets; agreed to a f2f meeting in Brussels; discussed need to review content to see that it meets global as well as regional requirements and will conduct a content review with that in mind. Subcommittee report: TSC TM: Had call last week. identified common components between COML and DTTN models and also the discord between the two. A little behind schedule now week because TL and DTTN participants were involved in other work but hope to catch up this week. TSC has been approached by consultants to the USDOT who will be contributing their requirements and may possibly participate in the work. The weekly meeting time has now stabilized at 08h00 UTC every Thursday. Team report: Digital Signatures TM: Sent PB's proposal to CrimsonLogic but haven't heard anything back yet. Will raise this again in the next TSC meeting. Team report: Code Lists GKH: The examples posted through JB only checked elements. There is nothing in schematron that would prevent rules on attributes, but the schematron xsl written by Rick Jelliffe does not support this. I have updated schematron 1.5 and sent it to Rick; if he accepts the additions, then we will be able to include rules for attributes as well as elements. JB: Regarding the conflict reported by GKH between his HISC work and his code list work, think that the priority should be to finish up code lists. [See also next item] Review of Atlantic and Europe/Asia calls SG: Regarding MB's comment about an audit trail for code list versions: proper use of the supplementary components [i.e., code list metadata] such as "version" would solve that problem without using substitution groups. Schedule review: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200508/msg00167.html We appear to be slipping a bit. See under SBSC regarding schema generation. ACTION ITEM REVIEW SW: Regarding an action from the Atlantic call: We need documentation of the spreadsheet structure and format no later than the first week of October. ACTION: TM to document the spreadsheet structure and format by the first week of October. This means a prose description of each column in the spreadsheets that we are now using. FOR THIS MEETING JB: What of the possibility of releasing 2.0 supporting materials as an independent package? Several people: This would help with HISC, SBS, and code lists. TM: Not that we should release 2.0 normative and then 2.0 informative, but rather that we don't need to have the informative materials for the first round of public review. SG: SBS should be normative. JB/TM: SBS could follow normatively in the second round. ACTION: JB to explore the idea of leaving the informative materials out of the first review cycle. Jon Bosak Chair, OASIS UBL TC
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]