[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Minutes of Atlantic UBL TC call 7 December 2005
MINUTES OF ATLANTIC UBL TC MEETING 16H00 - 18H00 UTC WEDNESDAY 7 DECEMBER 2005 ATTENDANCE Jon Bosak (chair) Peter Borresen Tony Coates Tim McGrath (vice chair) Zarella Rendon Paul Thorpe STANDING ITEMS Additions to the calendar: http://ibiblio.org/bosak/ubl/calendar.htm None. Subcommittee and team updates to Pacific call status reports None. Review of Pacific call No comments. Schedule review JB: If the content teams finish up next week, we can circulate the schemas and spreadsheets for a stakeholder sanity check just before the winter break, package the 2.0 CD the first two weeks of January, and begin public review just before we meet in Manhattan. This would allow us to focus the meeting on Support Package tasks. PB: We must keep to that schedule. Will have Draft 11 Friday, then TM merges PSC and TSC models, then we release the final draft at the end of next week. TM: The anchor point is production of the review package. The day we submit that determines the delivery date of the OASIS Standard at the end. ACTION: JB to inform OASIS about our plans for public review. ACTION ITEMS (GENERAL) ACTION: JB to send Manhattan meeting notice to the list. Done. ACTION: DK team to review the ebBP UBL transactions when they become available this week. PB: Did receive from SG yesterday and have sent on to those who have knowledge about these things. ACTION: AS to send the list of definitions from the UNECE cross-industry invoice document to the list. Done. ACTION: AS to send Section 3, Terms and Definitions, from ISO CD 24533 to the list. Done. ACTION ITEMS (CODE LISTS) ACTION: MartyB to test this approach [union of token and enum] against the latest draft 2.0 schemas (draft 10, sent out by PB about a week ago); will try to have this done next week. SW to generate the schema test package for this. TC: MG says this approach won't validate [in any meaningful way]. MartyB confirms but notes that it satisfies the NDRs. The problem is that anything will validate. TonyC: Why would we bother releasing codelist schemas that have the values but don't validate against those values? We were saying that you could have code lists with values or code lists without values, and you could use the ones with values to do hard validation. I feel like we're heading down an alley here; I don't see what we get that's useful. TM: This proposal is solving the wrong problem. ACTION: TonyC to raise the question of why we want codelist schemas that have codelist values but can't be validated against. ACTION: The UBL TC to review recent mail and come to grips with this. ACTION: NDR editors to reflect the decision to go with a union approach in the NDRs. This item has been rendered inapplicable by the observations above. ACTION: TC to review the questions posed by MG: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200511/msg00138.html We didn't get to this. ACTION ITEMS (NDRs) In the (announced) absence of MG, MC, and SW this week, the action items under this head were held over for next week's call. ACTION: SG to check to see where the problem Definitions are and see whether the Definitions can be put in the schemas [relating to issue 1 in NDR work session of 23 November]. [From the minutes of 2005.11.30: "SG: The defs are all there in one version of the QDT spreadsheets. The last QDT sent should have had the defs in the definition column. SW: Will look at that."] ACTION: SW to suggest a practical mechanical way to assign UIDs. ACTION: NDR editors to ensure that all mentions of importing the CCTS parameter schema have been removed. [Imported from Pacific minutes] ACTION: SG and SW to manually update the CC parameter schema. "SG: Atlantic call decided not to import the module. SW: We need to see this reflected in the NDRs." OTHER BUSINESS PB: Request a day at the January meeting in Manhattan to review the scenario descriptions (actually the suggested uses of UBL 2.0). JB: This joins customization and code lists as major agenda items for that meeting. Other UBL TC members should send additional items for the agenda. Jon Bosak Chair, OASIS UBL TC
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]