[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Minutes of Atlantic UBL TC call 14 December 2005
MINUTES OF ATLANTIC UBL TC MEETING 16H00 - 18H00 UTC WEDNESDAY 14 DECEMBER 2005 ATTENDANCE Jon Bosak (chair) Tony Coates Mavis Cournane Betty Harvey Zarella Rendon Andy Schoka STANDING ITEMS Additions to the calendar: http://ibiblio.org/bosak/ubl/calendar.htm None. Review of Pacific call No comments. Schedule review JB: (Reading from the agenda) "Note that this is our last Atlantic TC call for the year. Any questions regarding schema generation for the first UBL 2.0 public review that are still unresolved after this call will be decided (perhaps arbitrarily) by the TC chair and vice chair." AGREED that we must operate this way over the winter break in order to get the public review started. BH: EF must be configured before schema generation can begin. ACTION: BH and SW to sync up to configure EF for spreadsheet import. ACTION ITEMS (GENERAL) ACTION: JB to inform OASIS about our plans for public review. Done. ACTION ITEMS (CODE LISTS) AGREED that the position taken by JB last week was the correct one at this point: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200512/msg00027.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200512/msg00030.html JB: Is there data in genericode that needs to be reflected in the enum format? TonyC: Actually, it's genericode that needs to reflect UBL metadata. Currently this is in genericode as a kind of extension, but it needs to be put in its proper place. This should not affect the schedule or GKH's work. JB: Can we just use the current EF-generated format for enums? TonyC: MartyB has suggested valuable changes to the format; we should include these in the final version. ACTION: JB to document in the release notes for the initial public review that the enum format for code lists will be undergoing further technical adjustments, for example to the way that metadata attributes are done; TonyC to send an example for inclusion in the release notes. ACTION: TC to review the questions posed by MG: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200511/msg00138.html There's still (at least) one active question to consider here. "Does everyone else agree that a schema for type-b code lists should be required for UBL deliveries? Should it be normative?" TonyC: We said that the token form would be the default, but we would provide the enum form for people to use if they want to. AGREED that it's not necessary to answer this question for the initial public review cycle. ACTION ITEMS (NDRs) ACTION: SG to check to see where the problem Definitions are and see whether the Definitions can be put in the schemas [relating to issue 1 in NDR work session of 23 November]. [From the minutes of 2005.11.30: "SG: The defs are all there in one version of the QDT spreadsheets. The last QDT sent should have had the defs in the definition column. SW: Will look at that."] SW not on the call. ACTION: SW to suggest a practical mechanical way to assign UIDs. SW not on the call. AGREED that the only practical alternative at this point is just to go with whatever SW has developed for the initial public review. ACTION: NDR editors to ensure that all mentions of importing the CCTS parameter schema have been removed. Done. [Imported from Pacific minutes] ACTION: SG and SW to manually update the CC parameter schema. "SG: Atlantic call decided not to import the module. SW: We need to see this reflected in the NDRs." Done. OTHER BUSINESS JB: SW raised in the Pacific call, and MD has raised in email, the question of how we Q/A the schemas against the NDRs. MC: MG and I will have to do this, but it should be considered part of the NDR package review. We already have what we think is a final set of NDRs. AGREED that the NDR editors will perform schema/NDR Q/A as part of NDR package review during the January F2F in Manhattan. (This can take place in a track parallel to review of the Danish use cases.) AGREED that we need to feature GEFEG's role in 2.0 development. MC: Are we going to hold a user group meeting Friday 27 January? JB: No; we only got one or two indications of interest. MC: It would be good to wrap up Thursday evening so that we can travel starting Friday morning. ACTION: JB to try forming the initial meeting agenda in a way that allows us to finish up Thursday evening. ACTION: JB to check on internet access and printing facilities at the Manhattan meeting site. ZR: Carol Geyer at OASIS tells me that OASIS is creating new templates for the TC web pages; I could do that for UBL TC. JB: Offer gratefully accepted! ACTION: ZR to discuss this with CarolG and do the redesign. Jon Bosak Chair, OASIS UBL TC
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]